From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Neil, bug in the minimum guaranteed patch?
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:08:04 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705120407040.2957@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705112016050.18017@p34.internal.lan>
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> It worked for a while but this time I ran my raid check while doing an rsync,
> for a while, it guaranteed 1MB/s but then:
>
> $ cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
> 136448 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> resync=DELAYED
>
> md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0]
> 55681216 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> [============>........] check = 62.1% (34605376/55681216)
> finish=7.5min speed=46277K/sec
>
> md3 : active raid5 sdl1[9] sdk1[8] sdj1[7] sdi1[6] sdh1[5] sdg1[4] sdf1[3]
> sde1[2] sdd1[1] sdc1[0]
> 1318686336 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [10/10] [UUUUUUUUUU]
> [=>...................] check = 7.7% (11329412/146520704)
> finish=45.5min speed=49515K/sec
>
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> 16787776 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> unused devices: <none>
>
> It spiked back to 49MB/s its now 56MB/s -- something is wrong here. The
> rsync is now in dstate:
>
> root 18039 20.0 0.7 39200 30508 pts/9 D+
>
> Everything is very lagged, it is almost as if it is taking all of the
> available resources for the check!
>
> Justin.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Maybe not a bug in your patch rather-- but a bug somewhere, the scp was
already running before the echo check > /sys/../sync_action took place,
it worked for about 5-10 minutes and then the check took 100% precedence
over the rsync.
Justin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 0:18 Neil, bug in the minimum guaranteed patch? Justin Piszcz
2007-05-12 8:08 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705120407040.2957@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).