From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Raz <raziebe@gmail.com>
Cc: jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:10:45 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221110220.4196@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d96567b0706220801v76c1c19cl7448050e62e0860b@mail.gmail.com>
I have found a 16MB stripe_cache_size results in optimal performance after
testing many many values :)
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Raz wrote:
> On 6/22/07, Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Raz wrote:
>>
>> > What is your raid configuration ?
>> > Please note that the stripe_cache_size is acting as a bottle neck in some
>> > cases.
>>
>> Well, it's 3x SATA drives in raid5. 320G drives each, and I'm using a
>> 314G partition from each disk (the rest of the space is quiescent).
> what is the chunk size ?. Please note that a raid performance is dependent
> on the access pattern to the disks. What is this raid aimed to do ?
> more reads ? more writes ? If you can control the access pattern ,
> you might be able to increase performance.
>> > On 6/21/07, Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I've been futzing with stripe_cache_size on a 3x component raid5,
>> > > using 2.6.18.8-0.3-default on x86_64 (openSUSE 10.2).
>> > >
>> > > With the value set at 4096 I get pretty great write numbers.
>> > > 2048 and on down the write numbers slowly drop.
>> > >
>> > > However, at values above 512 the 'check' performance is terrible. By
>> > > 'check' performance I mean the value displayed by /proc/mdstat after
>> > > I issue:
>> > >
>> > > echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
>> > >
>> > > When I say "terrible" I mean < 3MB/s.
>> > > When I use 384, the performance goes to ~70MB/s
>> > > 512.. 72-73MB/s
>> > > 640.. 73-74MB/s
>> > >
>> > > 768.. 3300 K/s. Wow!
>> > >
>> > > Can somebody 'splain to me what is going on?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
>> > > -
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
>> in
>> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Raz
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
> --
> Raz
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 18:28 stripe_cache_size and performance Jon Nelson
2007-06-21 19:42 ` Raz
2007-06-21 23:09 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-22 15:01 ` Raz
2007-06-22 15:10 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-06-25 16:48 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-25 17:00 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 18:42 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 19:48 ` stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb] Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 19:49 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 20:36 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 20:42 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 22:12 ` stripe_cache_size and performance Jon Nelson
2007-06-25 22:19 ` Dan Williams
2007-06-25 23:23 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-25 22:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 13:58 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 14:00 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 14:16 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 14:37 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-26 15:22 ` Jon Nelson
2007-06-26 15:54 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221110220.4196@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raziebe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).