From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>
Cc: linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID5 Horrible Write Speed On 3ware Controller!!
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:26:29 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707181225560.26004@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469DF039.4040906@theendofthetunnel.de>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> On 18.07.2007 12:23, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> I am sure one of your questions is, well, why use SW RAID5 on the
>> controller? Because SW RAID5 is usually much faster than HW RAID5, at
>> least in my tests:
>
> Though that's no answer to your question, I really can't confirm that. I'm
> running a 3Ware 9650 with 8x 7200 SATAs in HW RAID 6. Writes are between
> 340-360MB/sec and reads peak at 430-450MB/sec. That seems to be the absolute
> possible maximum those drives can deliver. The card even seems to do some
> really smart stuff, as the read speed is in excess of the physical raw speed
> of 6 drives.
>
> You have done the usual settings, 3Ware recommends?
>
> echo 64 > /sys/block/sda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> echo 512 > /sys/block/sda/queue/nr_requests
> echo "deadline" > /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
> blockdev --setra 16384 /dev/sdX
>
> Have you set the correct su,sw options for XFS?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hannes Dorbath
>
I will try these options during future testing and re-visit the speeds of
regular HW RAID5, thanks! I know they are part of the 3ware doc and I
need to re-bench with these.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-18 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-18 10:23 Software RAID5 Horrible Write Speed On 3ware Controller!! Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 10:49 ` Hannes Dorbath
2007-07-18 16:26 ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-07-18 17:18 ` Bryan J. Smith
2007-07-18 10:59 ` Al Boldi
2007-07-18 12:01 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 11:05 ` Gabor Gombas
2007-07-18 11:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 11:26 ` Hannes Dorbath
2007-07-18 11:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 11:37 ` Hannes Dorbath
2007-07-18 11:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 12:51 ` Robin Hill
2007-07-18 14:26 ` Gabor Gombas
2007-07-18 11:17 ` Giuseppe Ghibò
2007-07-18 11:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 17:57 ` Bryan J. Smith
2007-07-18 11:26 ` Sander
2007-07-18 11:35 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 12:09 ` Sander
2007-07-18 12:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-18 13:32 ` Sander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0707181225560.26004@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=light@theendofthetunnel.de \
--cc=linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).