From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] use bio_endio instead of a call to bi_end_io
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:28:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806240122340.24220@engineering.redhat.com> (raw)
Hi
The is sequel to my previous patch to avoid bio_endio recursion. raid5
bypasses bio_endio and calls the method directly (although it does the
same as bio_endio). I changed bio_endio to avoid recursion, so it should
be used instead of calling the method.
Mikulas
--
Turn calls to bi->bi_end_io() into bio_endio(). Apparently bio_endio does
exactly the same error processing as is hardcoded at these places.
bio_endio() avoids recursion, so it should be used.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc7-devel/drivers/md/raid5.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc7-devel.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2008-06-24 07:28:15.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc7-devel/drivers/md/raid5.c 2008-06-24 07:28:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -115,9 +115,7 @@
return_bi = bi->bi_next;
bi->bi_next = NULL;
bi->bi_size = 0;
- bi->bi_end_io(bi,
- test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bi->bi_flags)
- ? 0 : -EIO);
+ bio_endio(bi, 0);
bi = return_bi;
}
}
@@ -3689,9 +3687,7 @@
if ( rw == WRITE )
md_write_end(mddev);
- bi->bi_end_io(bi,
- test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bi->bi_flags)
- ? 0 : -EIO);
+ bio_endio(bi, 0);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -3994,12 +3990,8 @@
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
remaining = --raid_bio->bi_phys_segments;
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (remaining == 0) {
-
- raid_bio->bi_end_io(raid_bio,
- test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &raid_bio->bi_flags)
- ? 0 : -EIO);
- }
+ if (remaining == 0)
+ bio_endio(raid_bio, 0);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->active_aligned_reads))
wake_up(&conf->wait_for_stripe);
return handled;
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-24 5:28 Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2008-06-24 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] use bio_endio instead of a call to bi_end_io Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0806240122340.24220@engineering.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox