* Help.
@ 2004-04-01 16:56 Jason C. Leach
2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård
2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason C. Leach @ 2004-04-01 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Help.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Help.
2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach
@ 2004-04-01 17:00 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Måns Rullgård @ 2004-04-01 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
"Jason C. Leach" <jleach@ocis.net> writes:
> Help.
Thanks for the offer. I'd like to know how to set up four ATA disks
for maximum performance, while retaining at least half the storage
space, and giving some fault tolerance.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* hardware raid with IDE == bad?
2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach
2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård
@ 2004-04-02 9:23 ` Mauricio
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mauricio @ 2004-04-02 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Is a hardware raid (say one of those you connect to a unix
box through its scsi port) that uses normal (as opposite to SATA) IDE
drives (you know, ATA100 and above) a bad idea?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-02 9:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-01 16:56 Help Jason C. Leach
2004-04-01 17:00 ` Help Måns Rullgård
2004-04-02 9:23 ` hardware raid with IDE == bad? Mauricio
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).