public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Su Yue <l@damenly.org>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,  Yu Kuai <yukuai@fnnas.com>,
	 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	 linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md: fix kobject reference leak in md_import_device()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:05:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4v58wo7.fsf@damenly.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANUHTR-G1X5OBXQNiw8-mXGiugnuP8ryHcsrMXLKcD4VefuKmw@mail.gmail.com> (Guangshuo Li's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:32:07 +0800")

On Tue 14 Apr 2026 at 19:32, Guangshuo Li 
<lgs201920130244@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Su,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 at 09:29, Su Yue <l@damenly.org> wrote:
>> Why not just:
>>
>> out_blkdev_put:
>>         kobject_put(&rdev->kobj);
>>         fput(rdev->bdev_file);
>> out_clear_rdev:
>>         md_rdev_clear(rdev);
>> out_free_rdev:
>>         kfree(rdev);
>>         return ERR_PTR(err);
>>
>> --
>> Su
>
> I wonder if that ordering might cause a problem.
>
> After kobject_init(&rdev->kobj, &rdev_ktype), 
> kobject_put(&rdev->kobj)
> may immediately drop the last reference and run the release 
> callback
> from rdev_ktype:
>
> static const struct kobj_type rdev_ktype = {
>         .release        = rdev_free,
>         .sysfs_ops      = &rdev_sysfs_ops,
>         .default_groups = rdev_default_groups,
> };
>
> static void rdev_free(struct kobject *ko)
> {
>         struct md_rdev *rdev = container_of(ko, struct md_rdev, 
>         kobj);
>         kfree(rdev);
> }
>
> So in:
>
> out_blkdev_put:
>         kobject_put(&rdev->kobj);
>         fput(rdev->bdev_file);
>
> it seems possible that kobject_put() would already free rdev via
> rdev_free(), and then fput(rdev->bdev_file) would dereference 
> rdev
> after free.
>
> That was why I changed it to:
>
> out_blkdev_put:
>         fput(rdev->bdev_file);
>         md_rdev_clear(rdev);
>         kobject_put(&rdev->kobj);
>         return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> so that the cleanup which still needs rdev is done before
> kobject_put(), and this path returns directly instead of falling
> through to the old kfree(rdev) path.
>
> Please let me know if I overlooked something.
>
Thanks for your detailed explanation. It's totally correct.

--
Su

> Thanks,
> Guangshuo

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-13 14:17 [PATCH v2] md: fix kobject reference leak in md_import_device() Guangshuo Li
2026-04-14  1:28 ` Su Yue
2026-04-14 11:32   ` Guangshuo Li
2026-04-14 14:05     ` Su Yue [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4v58wo7.fsf@damenly.org \
    --to=l@damenly.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox