From: Johannes Segitz <johannes.segitz@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance of a software raid 5
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:10:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5cd9eed0904201710j5b05d9cam8a61b50f34eda2c0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49ED096E.1000002@anonymous.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:46 AM, John Robinson
<john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk> wrote:
> I would have thought it's because you're running in degraded mode and one in
> 3 sectors is having to be regenerated from the parity. It still seems a bit
> slow, though.
i don't think that that is a problem. The data is there without
redundancy so i can't see
how there would be the need to calculate anything
> I'm not quite sure whether I should be disappointed at my writes being so
> slow. Certainly there's a lot of rattling during writing, which probably
> indicates lots of seeks to write ext3's journal. But reads are roughly what
> I expected, at about three times the single-disc throughput.
200 MB/s reads would be nice but i expected quite a bit more speed
writing too. I know
that you don't get an O(n) speedup but falling behind the normal performance of
a single drive seems not okay.
Johannes
Btw.:The controller is on PCI-E so no bottleneck there
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 17:12 Performance of a software raid 5 Johannes Segitz
2009-04-20 23:46 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 0:10 ` Johannes Segitz [this message]
2009-04-21 0:52 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:05 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 1:12 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:19 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:04 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 5:46 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:40 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-24 13:49 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-26 17:03 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 18:56 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 12:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-22 22:32 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 9:07 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 0:44 ` Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap? John Robinson
2009-04-21 1:33 ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21 2:13 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21 5:50 ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:05 ` John Robinson
2009-05-22 23:00 ` Redeeman
2009-04-22 9:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-22 12:41 ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:02 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-23 7:48 ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:21 ` Andre Noll
2009-04-23 8:04 ` John Robinson
2009-04-23 20:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 16:00 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5cd9eed0904201710j5b05d9cam8a61b50f34eda2c0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=johannes.segitz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).