linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Segitz <johannes.segitz@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance of a software raid 5
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:10:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5cd9eed0904201710j5b05d9cam8a61b50f34eda2c0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49ED096E.1000002@anonymous.org.uk>

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:46 AM, John Robinson
<john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk> wrote:
> I would have thought it's because you're running in degraded mode and one in
> 3 sectors is having to be regenerated from the parity. It still seems a bit
> slow, though.

i don't think that that is a problem. The data is there without
redundancy so i can't see
how there would be the need to calculate anything

> I'm not quite sure whether I should be disappointed at my writes being so
> slow. Certainly there's a lot of rattling during writing, which probably
> indicates lots of seeks to write ext3's journal. But reads are roughly what
> I expected, at about three times the single-disc throughput.

200 MB/s reads would be nice but i expected quite a bit more speed
writing too. I know
that you don't get an O(n) speedup but falling behind the normal performance of
a single drive seems not okay.

Johannes
Btw.:The controller is on PCI-E so no bottleneck there

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-21  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 17:12 Performance of a software raid 5 Johannes Segitz
2009-04-20 23:46 ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  0:10   ` Johannes Segitz [this message]
2009-04-21  0:52     ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:05       ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21  1:12         ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:19         ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21  2:04           ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21  5:46             ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:40               ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-24 13:49                 ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-26 17:03               ` Johannes Segitz
2009-04-21 18:56             ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22 12:29               ` Bill Davidsen
2009-04-22 22:32                 ` Corey Hickey
2009-04-22  9:07           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21  0:44   ` Poor write performance with write-intent bitmap? John Robinson
2009-04-21  1:33     ` NeilBrown
2009-04-21  2:13       ` John Robinson
2009-04-21  5:50         ` Neil Brown
2009-04-21 12:05           ` John Robinson
2009-05-22 23:00             ` Redeeman
2009-04-22  9:16         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-22 12:41           ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:02             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-23  7:48               ` John Robinson
2009-04-22 14:21             ` Andre Noll
2009-04-23  8:04               ` John Robinson
2009-04-23 20:23                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-04-21 16:00       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5cd9eed0904201710j5b05d9cam8a61b50f34eda2c0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=johannes.segitz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).