From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Segitz <johannes.segitz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance of a software raid 5
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:40:22 +0200
Message-ID: <a5cd9eed0904210540y688d9dc6pdc0866b86a748d2a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a5cd9eed0904201012o67503049laa50f4cb5b8d88de@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49ED096E.1000002@anonymous.org.uk>
	 <a5cd9eed0904201710j5b05d9cam8a61b50f34eda2c0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49ED18E6.1090301@anonymous.org.uk>
	 <a5cd9eed0904201805n1b52aafm206bda5a1afc0b5c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <15c92f8bd27d912e292c013fea2467e4.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
	 <a5cd9eed0904201904o29c02a8csb875ae68ba19e681@mail.gmail.com>
	 <18925.23969.113047.133385@notabene.brown>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <18925.23969.113047.133385@notabene.brown>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> I suspect you will see that improve when you add another drive that it
> isn't running degraded.

I will give it a try and i hope you're right since i can't recreate the array
when i used the other drives because currently they are used in another
array which then will be destroyed. I'll try it later and then post the results

Johannes