public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com>,
	song@kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com, linan122@huawei.com,
	xni@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yangerkun@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, zhengqixing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync action to repair badblocks
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 08:30:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYIirWALBGrMxmbw@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40f37494-cf9c-4bc3-aa38-75c76b5d988e@plouf.fr.eu.org>

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 09:08:18AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> On 03/02/2026 à 08:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Just curious, but what kind of devices do you see that have
> > permanent bad blocks at a fixed location that are not fixed by
> > rewriting the sector?
> 
> I have seen this with several hard disk drives of various brands, even
> though SMART attribute #5 (reallocated sector count) had not reached the
> limit.

Weird.  Can you share the models?  I'm especially curious if these
are consumer of enterprise drives and of what vintage.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03  6:12 [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync action to repair badblocks Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  6:12 ` [RFC v2 1/5] md: add helpers for requested sync action Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  6:12 ` [RFC v2 2/5] md: serialize requested sync actions and clear stale request state Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  6:12 ` [RFC v2 3/5] md: rename mdstat action "recovery" to "recover" Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  6:12 ` [RFC v2 4/5] md: introduce MAX_RAID_DISKS macro to replace magic number Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  6:12 ` [RFC v2 5/5] md/raid1: introduce rectify action to repair badblocks Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03  7:31 ` [RFC v2 0/5] md/raid1: introduce a new sync " Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-03  8:08   ` Pascal Hambourg
2026-02-03 16:30     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-02-03 20:36       ` Pascal Hambourg
2026-02-04 16:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-03  8:08   ` Zheng Qixing
2026-02-03 16:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-04  9:29       ` Zheng Qixing
2026-02-04  9:32       ` Zheng Qixing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aYIirWALBGrMxmbw@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linan122@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
    --cc=zhengqixing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox