From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Subject: Re: MD Feature Request: non-degraded component replacement
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:51:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812160450080.28063@p34.internal.lan>
References: <49477689.2010208@dgreaves.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <49477689.2010208@dgreaves.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, LinuxRaid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids



On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, David Greaves wrote:

> Personally I think this feature is more important than the reshaping requests;
> of course that's just one opinion after replacing about 20 flaky 1Tb drives in
> the past 6 months :)
What were the make/model of those drives, how did they fail?