From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Justin Piszcz Subject: Re: MD Feature Request: non-degraded component replacement Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:37:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <49477689.2010208@dgreaves.com> <49478924.9010004@cgv.tugraz.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49478924.9010004@cgv.tugraz.at> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lars Schimmer Cc: LinuxRaid List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Lars Schimmer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Piszcz wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, David Greaves wrote: >> >>> Personally I think this feature is more important than the reshaping >>> requests; >>> of course that's just one opinion after replacing about 20 flaky 1Tb >>> drives in >>> the past 6 months :) >> What were the make/model of those drives, how did they fail? > > Far more important: how much do you have in production? > AS I got roughly 15 Seagate 1 GB HDs here and not one of them failed for > the last year. > And 20 of 30 running is really bad, but 20 from 500 running is not as > bad as it seems ;-) Agree, but I would still be interested in the make/model and what controller they were attached to and how they failed?