From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:33:11 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807081232350.32659@bbs.intern> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807080433550.17980@p34.internal.lan>
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gerhard,
>>>
>>> It /could/ be the port itself if you have changed the cable and disk..
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but it is very unlikely. I have written TB of data there without any
>> problems. Anyway this is my 3rd exchanged SAMSUNG disk ...
>>
>>
>>> Have you tried loading the disk with dd and seeing if you can reproduce
>>> the problem? You are getting the same error I get generally, I can
>>> recommend turning OFF NCQ first and see if the problem goes away.
>>>
>>> # Define DISKS.
>>> cd /sys/block
>>> DISKS=$(/bin/ls -1d sd[a-z])
>>>
>>> # Disable NCQ on all disks.
>>> echo "Disabling NCQ on all disks..."
>>> for i in $DISKS
>>> do
>>> echo "Disabling NCQ on $i"
>>> echo 1 > /sys/block/"$i"/device/queue_depth
>>> done
>>>
>>
>> I tried to disable NCQ on all disks and tried to rebuild the raid, but it
>> still failed to rebuild with the same error message.
>>
>> I also tried the nolapic kernel parameter without success.
>>
>> /dev/sda: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 0
>> /dev/sdb: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 0
>> /dev/sdc: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 091 091 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 413
>> /dev/sdd: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 0
>> /dev/sde: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 0
>> /dev/sdf: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail
>> Always - 0
>>
>> The only thing is that the Reallocated_Sector_Ct is still >0 on /dev/sdc
>> (keep in mind this is my 3rd new Samsung disk on /dev/sdc and I had up to
>> 3000 Reallocated_Sector_Ct on previous disks in < 1 day !!!).
>>
>> Should I replace the disk a fourth time?
>>
>> When you search in google you find a lot of threads with the timeout
>> problem. Might this be a software issue?
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> Please run:
>
> smartctl -t short /dev/sdc
> sleep 300
> smartctl -t long /dev/sdc
>
> Wait 2-3 hours or more and:
>
> smartctl -a /dev/sdc
I'm changing the disk one more time ...
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 16:57 Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10) Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-07 15:04 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 15:08 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 16:04 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 6:24 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08 6:59 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08 8:35 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:31 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08 8:34 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:33 ` Gerhard Wiesinger [this message]
2008-07-08 13:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-09 5:37 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-10 1:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-12 8:29 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
[not found] <fa.u8J+BqAcxU1mg8ob9pMBJaAHBPo@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-05 18:38 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 18:54 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 19:04 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 19:28 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 23:22 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 23:24 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 10:31 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 12:13 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 12:42 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 19:51 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07 9:45 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2008-07-07 9:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07 18:14 ` Michal Soltys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807081232350.32659@bbs.intern \
--to=lists@wiesinger.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).