linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:29:59 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807121025310.10748@bbs.intern> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807090726200.686@bbs.intern>



On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>>>>>> Hi Gerhard,
>>>> 
>>>> Please run:
>>>> 
>>>> smartctl -t short /dev/sdc
>>>> sleep 300
>>>> smartctl -t long /dev/sdc
>>>> 
>>>> Wait 2-3 hours or more and:
>>>> 
>>>> smartctl -a /dev/sdc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm changing the disk one more time ...
>> 
>> Once you replace the disk please re-run the tests shown above and show us 
>> the output please.
>> 
>> How many SAMSUNG disks have you gone through, do they really fail that 
>> often?
>> 
>
> Hello Justin!
>
> Setup Power suppply:
> sda-sdd are on the same power supply cable, sde, sdf are on a second one.
>
> I changed the disk to a new SAMSUNG disk and the first raid resync did NOT 
> work and I had 1 reallocated sector ...
>
> Also the RMA guy at our very good computer store (http://www.ditech.at/) were 
> helpfull in changing the disks and he hates the SAMSUNG disks because of high 
> RMA rates ...
>
> But:
> smart checks were ok (details see below). The smart checks are shown as 
> aborted, but before running the next tests they were at "Completed without 
> error" (strange).
>
> Now sdc has it's own power cable and I'm running a raid resync now.
>
> Power supply is:
> ATX 385 Watt, ENERMAX PRO82+
>
> Load on power supply measured on 220V side with a true RMS Wattmeter:
> Power off: 6,5W
> Max seen at power up: 196W
> BIOS: 114,1W
> Linux idle: 92,0W
> 100% Disk I/O, 100% CPU load: 149,6W
> => Everything fine and as expected.
>
> I'll keep you up to date ...
>

Hello!

It looks like it works now without any problems:
*) Serveral RAID checks (once a day)
*) smartctl checks were fine
*) Only one reallocated sector
*) Writing the disk full with random data

So the possibilities for the fault are:
*) SATA power connector (most likely I would guess)
*) 4th disk is now ok
*) Other 220V power cable connector through the Wattmeter

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-05 16:57 Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10) Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 17:35 ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-07 15:04 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 15:08   ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-07 16:04     ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08  6:24       ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  6:59         ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  8:35           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:31             ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08  8:34         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-08 10:33           ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-08 13:15             ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-09  5:37               ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2008-07-10  1:27                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-12  8:29                 ` Gerhard Wiesinger [this message]
     [not found] <fa.u8J+BqAcxU1mg8ob9pMBJaAHBPo@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-05 18:38 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 18:54   ` Jon Nelson
2008-07-05 19:04     ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 19:28   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-05 23:22     ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-05 23:24       ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 10:31         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 12:13           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 12:42             ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-06 19:51               ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07  9:45         ` Mattias Wadenstein
2008-07-07  9:57           ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-07 18:14             ` Michal Soltys

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807121025310.10748@bbs.intern \
    --to=lists@wiesinger.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).