From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34C3C433DB for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C43365253 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229688AbhCILRu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:17:50 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:39749 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229546AbhCILRY (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:17:24 -0500 IronPort-SDR: 6idYoSBOjSr2NMyunbpF4WDi8cq+ovrPXHJ4HgreMt1V9W6VT+z5KXfog6sKeMrYmq1qwOzh+4 Y5hAHDbh5lUA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9917"; a="175816384" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,234,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="175816384" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2021 03:17:24 -0800 IronPort-SDR: AppieSNTT3zSQgv53vyCC6bWfBTy0ivb/Q3+kvIf7amvFhwgOusnPk8hD7HiApcqX5Hmru3tsp TMJbDTX/8P6Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,234,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="447467318" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2021 03:17:24 -0800 Received: from [10.213.24.57] (mtkaczyk-MOBL1.ger.corp.intel.com [10.213.24.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04FE0580866; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:17:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mdmonitor: check if udev has finished events processing To: Michael Fritscher , Wols Lists , Jes Sorensen , Oleksandr Shchirskyi Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org References: <20210114141416.42934-1-oleksandr.shchirskyi@intel.com> <51ec46c1-c632-b3a9-010f-8f13aee0e02c@linux.intel.com> <60473C1F.4080602@youngman.org.uk> <1b5b0495-c645-7f81-24f4-07fbad54ca0e@fritscher.net> From: "Tkaczyk, Mariusz" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:17:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1b5b0495-c645-7f81-24f4-07fbad54ca0e@fritscher.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org On 09.03.2021 10:45, Michael Fritscher wrote: > Am 09.03.21 um 10:13 schrieb Wols Lists: >> Is udev part of systemd? Are there alternate implementations for the >> anti-systemd-holdouts? Iirc you don't need systemd itself to have udev, >> but it might provoke a few screams ... >> >> My current (gentoo) system is OpenRC, but that's still on KDE4 and >> hasn't been updated in a couple of years (don't ask why). My new system >> is currently being built and is gentoo/systemd, but it's clear the >> anti-systemd sentiment is still strong ... >> >> Cheers, >> Wol >> > > Good day, > > there is e.g. eudev ( https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Eudev ) with > the explicit target to be used without systemd. > > Best regards, > Michael Fritscher > It is a udev replacement and offers similar functionality. I'm wondering on configuration without udev (systemd or other forks). Is it still a case? Thanks, Mariusz