From: Vishal Verma <vverma@digitalocean.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
rgoldwyn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] md: raid456 add nowait support
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 21:02:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b80a0898-af7f-ec1b-9f4e-6d24cdb2e38a@digitalocean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW5m69F19w85N67WGSZfTgPfkgQv0zhYk7uGXwzkoAJh_w@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/25/21 5:07 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 2:13 PM Vishal Verma <vverma@digitalocean.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/25/21 12:28 AM, Vishal Verma wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/24/21 7:14 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:06 PM Vishal Verma<vverma@digitalocean.com> wrote:
>>>>> Returns EAGAIN in case the raid456 driver would block
>>>>> waiting for situations like:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Reshape operation,
>>>>> - Discard operation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma<vverma@digitalocean.com>
>>>> I think we will need the following fix for raid456:
>>> Ack
>>>> ============================ 8< ============================
>>>>
>>>> diff --git i/drivers/md/raid5.c w/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> index 6ab22f29dacd..55d372ce3300 100644
>>>> --- i/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> +++ w/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> @@ -5717,6 +5717,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev
>>>> *mddev, struct bio *bi)
>>>> raid5_release_stripe(sh);
>>>> /* Bail out if REQ_NOWAIT is set */
>>>> if (bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
>>>> + finish_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w);
>>>> bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -5734,6 +5735,7 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev
>>>> *mddev, struct bio *bi)
>>>> raid5_release_stripe(sh);
>>>> /* Bail out if REQ_NOWAIT is set */
>>>> if (bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
>>>> +
>>>> finish_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w);
>>>> bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -5829,7 +5831,6 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev
>>>> *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>>>> last_sector = bio_end_sector(bi);
>>>> bi->bi_next = NULL;
>>>>
>>>> - md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
>>>> /* Bail out if REQ_NOWAIT is set */
>>>> if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
>>>> (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
>>>> @@ -5837,9 +5838,11 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev
>>>> *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>>>> ? (logical_sector > conf->reshape_progress &&
>>>> logical_sector <= conf->reshape_safe)
>>>> : (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe && logical_sector
>>>> < conf->reshape_progress))) {
>>>> bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
>>>> + if (rw == WRITE)
>>>> + md_write_end(mddev);
>>>> return true;
>>>> }
>>>> -
>>>> + md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
>>>> prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>>>> for (; logical_sector < last_sector; logical_sector +=
>>>> RAID5_STRIPE_SECTORS(conf)) {
>>>> int previous;
>>>>
>>>> ============================ 8< ============================
>>>>
>>>> Vishal, please try to trigger all these conditions (including raid1,
>>>> raid10) and make sure
>>>> they work properly.
>>>>
>>>> For example, I triggered raid5 reshape and used something like the
>>>> following to make
>>>> sure the logic is triggered:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> index 55d372ce3300..e79de48a0027 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>>>> @@ -5840,6 +5840,11 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev
>>>> *mddev, struct bio * bi)
>>>> bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
>>>> if (rw == WRITE)
>>>> md_write_end(mddev);
>>>> + {
>>>> + static int count = 0;
>>>> + if (count++ < 10)
>>>> + pr_info("%s REQ_NOWAIT return\n", __func__);
>>>> + }
>>>> return true;
>>>> }
>>>> md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Song
>>>>
>>> Sure, will try this and verify for raid1/10.
> Please also try test raid5 with discard. I haven't tested those two
> conditions yet.
Ack.
>
>> I am running into an issue during raid10 reshape. I can see the nowait
>> code getting triggered during reshape, but it seems like the reshape
>> operation was stuck as soon as I issued write IO using FIO to the array
>> during reshape.
>> FIO also seem stuck i.e no IO went through...
> Maybe the following could fix it?
>
> Thanks,
> Song
Hmm no luck, still the same issue.
> diff --git i/drivers/md/raid10.c w/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index e2c524d50ec0..291eceaeb26c 100644
> --- i/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ w/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -1402,14 +1402,14 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev
> *mddev, struct bio *bio,
> : (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector + sectors > conf->reshape_safe &&
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector < conf->reshape_progress))) {
> /* Need to update reshape_position in metadata */
> - mddev->reshape_position = conf->reshape_progress;
> - set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
> - BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) |
> BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
> - md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> return;
> }
> + mddev->reshape_position = conf->reshape_progress;
> + set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
> + BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) |
> BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
> + md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> raid10_log(conf->mddev, "wait reshape metadata");
> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait,
> !test_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-26 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 21:51 [PATCH] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-02 3:41 ` Li Feng
2021-11-02 5:01 ` Song Liu
2021-11-02 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Vishal Verma
2021-11-02 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-02 18:35 ` Song Liu
2021-11-04 4:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-11-04 4:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-06 15:38 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-11-07 0:16 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-08 22:17 ` Song Liu
2021-11-08 22:36 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] md: raid1 add nowait support Guoqing Jiang
2021-11-07 0:18 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-08 22:32 ` Song Liu
2021-11-08 22:39 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-09 20:59 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 17:02 ` Song Liu
2021-11-10 17:04 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] md: raid10 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-14 0:32 ` Song Liu
2021-12-14 15:27 ` Vishal Verma
2021-11-10 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-11-11 21:42 ` Song Liu
[not found] ` <f8c2a2bc-a885-8254-2b39-fc0c969ac70d@digitalocean.com>
2021-11-19 4:07 ` Song Liu
2021-11-19 4:20 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-09 16:53 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-09 16:59 ` Song Liu
2021-12-09 17:01 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-10 2:16 ` Song Liu
2021-12-10 7:18 ` Song Liu
2021-12-10 18:26 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-13 5:56 ` Song Liu
2021-12-13 22:43 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-13 23:35 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <78d5f029-791e-6d3f-4871-263ec6b5c09b@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-14 1:11 ` Song Liu
2021-12-14 1:12 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-14 15:30 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-14 17:08 ` Song Liu
2021-12-14 18:09 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:33 ` Song Liu
2021-12-15 22:20 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] md: raid1 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 20:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] md: raid10 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-22 23:58 ` Song Liu
2021-12-23 1:47 ` Song Liu
2021-12-21 20:06 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 22:02 ` John Stoffel
2021-12-25 2:14 ` Song Liu
[not found] ` <aadc6d52-bc6e-527a-3b9c-0be225f9b727@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-25 22:13 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-26 0:07 ` Song Liu
2021-12-26 4:02 ` Vishal Verma [this message]
2021-12-26 21:20 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-22 16:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Jens Axboe
2021-12-23 1:22 ` Song Liu
2021-12-23 2:57 ` Song Liu
2021-12-23 3:08 ` Vishal Verma
2022-01-02 0:11 ` Song Liu
2022-01-02 2:08 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-23 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] md: raid10 add nowait support Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:42 ` Song Liu
2021-12-15 22:20 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 0:30 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 16:40 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-16 16:45 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 18:49 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-16 19:40 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 20:18 ` Song Liu
2021-12-16 20:37 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 23:50 ` Song Liu
[not found] ` <bd90d6e6-adb4-2696-3110-fad0b1ee00dc@digitalocean.com>
2021-12-21 8:13 ` Song Liu
2021-12-21 15:29 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-21 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 16:26 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-16 18:14 ` Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] md: raid456 " Vishal Verma
2021-12-15 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Song Liu
2021-12-14 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] md: raid456 add nowait support Song Liu
2021-12-13 23:50 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b80a0898-af7f-ec1b-9f4e-6d24cdb2e38a@digitalocean.com \
--to=vverma@digitalocean.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).