From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: md/raid10: Replace printk() calls by the usage of higher level interfaces Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 20:32:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <1475771616.1914.9.camel@perches.com> <321cc4aa-679a-a2fe-be0b-96285b19e489@users.sourceforge.net> <1475775546.1914.15.camel@perches.com> <21fb08b6-d5b7-0dd6-0cbd-0f0a4bf56a9e@users.sourceforge.net> <1475777887.1820.1.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1475777887.1820.1.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> Would it be nicer if a single call will be sufficient for such a log message? >> >> Can an idea picked up which was discussed for the update suggestion >> "[PATCH 4/4] Input-gameport: Replace some printk() calls by pr_info() in joydump_connect()" >> for a moment (on 2016-09-24)? >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1474735656.23838.6.camel@perches.com>; >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/24/149 > > That'd be great. > Pease come back only after you've implemented that. Does this use case show another improvement opportunity for involved software developers (besides me)? Are there any more contributors around who would like to tackle such a challenge? Regards, Markus