From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jon Nelson" Subject: Re: weird issues with raid1 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:32:55 -0600 Message-ID: References: <18757.62097.166706.244330@notabene.brown> <18758.52536.345145.238926@notabene.brown> <18759.678.74091.236787@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18759.678.74091.236787@notabene.brown> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: LinuxRaid List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Neil Brown wrote: > On Monday December 15, jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net wrote: >> I hope this helps. > > Yes it does, though I generally prefer to get more complete logs. If > I get the surrounding log lines then I know what isn't there as well > as what is - and it isn't always clear at first which bits will be > important. Quite literally the rest of /var/log/messages was stuff unrelated (dhcp, etc...). However, I'll try to include more context next time. > The problem here is that --incremental doesn't provide the --re-add > functionality that you are depending on. That was an oversight on my > part. I'll see if I can get it fixed. > In the mean time, you'll need to use --re-add (or --add, it does the > same thing in your situation) to add nbd0 to the array. Why does it usually work as though I *had* used --re-add (and specified the right array)? -- Jon