linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Benecke <jens@spamfreemail.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian 'woody', homebrew 2.4.25 kernel
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:08:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cet7vc$mt7$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: S267610AbUHEJ5F/20040805095705Z+97@vger.kernel.org

robin-lists@robinbowes.com wrote:

>> >> How about RAIDing the root partition? If one drive fails will the
>> >> other be able to boot via LILO? How about GRUB? Which do
>> > 
>> > I have my root partition on a RAID1 mirror. I use grub and have
>> > "installed" grub to both mirrored drives so I can boot off either,
>> > e.g. if one fails. That reminds me, I must test this.
>> 
>> That's exactly what I want.
> 
> I've got some rough notes I made. I may tidy them up and publish them on
> my web site.

Hi Robin,

I'm still a bit torn between buying a 3ware hardware RAID for €140.- and
just using 'md'. The box is an Athlon64 3GHz, so it'll have enough CPU
power to do the RAID in software, but with partitioning etc, I think the
hardware raid will be easier to handle because you can just ignore it. As
long as the 3ware BIOS will handle failing drives, read/write errors, etc
etc. properly.

Right?
    
>> > keep /var/tmp and /tmp on the root partition.
>> 
>> No. I don't want a rogue script to fill up my root partition.
> 
> That, of course, is the reason you would want to keep /var/tmp and/or /tmp
> on separate partitions (or on the same partition - just symlink so
> /var/tmp and /tmp are the same.)

I would probably not symlink but I'd put them both on the same partition. 
  
>> What I mean is, will md resync automatically or would I have
>> to initiate this manually?
> 
> Md should re-sync automatically.

... even onto a new blank disk? Or would you have to tell md manually "this
is the new spare, please sync"? Is this easy to do? Something like

        - copy partition table
        - for FOO in 1 2 3 4 5 ; do tell md "sync hda$FOO to hdc$FOO"

or is it more complicated?
 
>> This setup seems quite complicated. Did you test the setup,
>> ie. removed one of the MD disks and looked what happened?
> I deliberated long and hard about how to implement my new system and this
> was about the least complicated route!

Oh. ;)
 

>> >> The goal is to have as "stress free" a system as possible
>> >> as little manual configuration, and in event of emergencies, as
>> >> little work to do, as possible.
>> > If you want stress free, buy a Netapps storage appliance ;o)
>> If they do all the rest that I need (smtp, web, file server,
> I was being slightly slippant - Netapps just do big storage arrays with
> very high availability. For example, if they detect that a drive is
> failing they send an email to Netapps and an engineer comes round with a
> replacement disk all without any user intervention! I guess they're the
> Rolls Royce of storage solutions. Expensive though.

Ah. Well I don't think this'll fit in our budget. :)


-- 
Jens Benecke
http://www.hitchhikers.de - Europas kostenlose Mitfahrzentrale seit 1998
http://www.rb-hosting.de - Webhosting mit Extras - PHP ab €9 - SSH ab €19
http://www.spamfreemail.de - 100% saubere Postfächer, garantiert!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-05 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-04  8:42 Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian "woody", homebrew 2.4.25 kernel Jens Benecke
2004-08-04  9:00 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-04 11:10   ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-04 12:25     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-04 12:32       ` Tim Small
2004-08-04 10:00 ` Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian 'woody', " Robin Bowes
2004-08-04 10:29   ` Mark Watts
2004-08-04 10:34     ` Tim Small
2004-08-04 10:37     ` Robin Bowes
2004-08-04 11:12     ` Alvin Oga
2004-08-04 23:51       ` Mark Hahn
2004-08-05  6:16   ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-05  7:26     ` Daniel Pittman
2004-08-05  9:20       ` Tim Small
2004-08-05 12:02         ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-05  9:57     ` robin-lists
2004-08-05 12:08       ` Jens Benecke [this message]
2004-08-05 12:38         ` Mark Watts
2004-08-05 12:49           ` Katarina WONG
2004-08-05 15:42         ` robin-lists
2004-08-04 10:28 ` Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian "woody", " Tim Small

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='cet7vc$mt7$1@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=jens@spamfreemail.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).