From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 18:53:50 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1779412152.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
[CHANGELOG]
RFC->v1:
- Remove unused btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members
To make space for the new member.
- Fix a duplicated bg->flags assignment in fill_dummy_bgs()
Just exposed by the last patch which also touches that code.
- Use a dedicated member to record the on-disk chunk type
So it's less fragile than the RFC patch.
The single-data-RAID56 (2 disks raid5 or 3 disks raid6) is not a feature
that should be supported in the first place, thus raid56 is going to
remove such support.
Meanwhile rejecting single-data-RAID56 will cause existing btrfs users
unable to mount their fs, even if there is only a single
empty chunk with that flag, mostly caused by some degraded mount.
So to avoid impacting existing users, implement an internal
single-data-RAID56 to RAID1/RAID1C3 mapping, to co-operate with the
upstream raid56 lib changes.
Qu Wenruo (3):
btrfs: remove btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members
btrfs: remove duplicated block group type assignment
btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 3 +--
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 10 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 9:23 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: remove btrfs_chunk_map::io_(align|width) members Qu Wenruo
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: remove duplicated block group type assignment Qu Wenruo
2026-05-22 9:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: disguise single-data-RAID56 as RAID1/RAID1C3 Qu Wenruo
2026-05-23 14:23 ` David Sterba
2026-05-23 22:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-24 4:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-25 10:12 ` David Sterba
2026-05-25 10:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-25 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-25 10:17 ` David Sterba
2026-05-25 10:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-05-26 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-26 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1779412152.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox