From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: chen cheng <chenchneg33@gmail.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ?
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 09:35:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1c7de09-7be0-362c-5429-ed09866c8834@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD8sxFLS7A3HLL3diYRU5fHxCUb_y-QJS666k5cPOgQ8wGFDjw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
在 2025/08/06 21:34, chen cheng 写道:
> static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
> {
> ...
>
> if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
> (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
> get_reshape_loc(mddev, conf, logical_sector) ==
> LOC_INSIDE_RESHAPE) {
> bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
> if (rw == WRITE)
> md_write_end(mddev);
> return true;
> }
>
> if (likely(conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector)) {
> ...
> } else {
> add_wait_queue(&conf->wait_for_reshape, &wait);
> on_wq = true;
> }
>
> ...
> }
>
>
> In raid5_make_request(), if a reshape is progressing and the current
> IO request is not within the reshape range and has the REQ_NOWAIT
> flag, does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of
> REQ_NOWAIT?
The mdraid really doesn't support REQ_NOWAIT, for now the flag is just
ignored and I think BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT should be cleared for raid1/10/456.
BTW, support it will require a lot of work, because IO error handling is
too complicated, we don't want to record badblocks for nowait IO
failure, however, if write disk a succeed while write disk b failed,
whatever we do will violate the semantics of nowait.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 13:34 md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ? chen cheng
2025-08-07 1:35 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1c7de09-7be0-362c-5429-ed09866c8834@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=chenchneg33@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).