linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ?
@ 2025-08-06 13:34 chen cheng
  2025-08-07  1:35 ` Yu Kuai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: chen cheng @ 2025-08-06 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
{
        ...

        if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
            (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
            get_reshape_loc(mddev, conf, logical_sector) ==
LOC_INSIDE_RESHAPE) {
                bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
                if (rw == WRITE)
                        md_write_end(mddev);
                return true;
        }

        if (likely(conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector)) {
                ...
        } else {
                add_wait_queue(&conf->wait_for_reshape, &wait);
                on_wq = true;
        }

        ...
}


In raid5_make_request(), if a reshape is progressing and the current
IO request is not within the reshape range and has the REQ_NOWAIT
flag, does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of
REQ_NOWAIT?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ?
  2025-08-06 13:34 md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ? chen cheng
@ 2025-08-07  1:35 ` Yu Kuai
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2025-08-07  1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: chen cheng, linux-raid, yukuai (C)

Hi,

在 2025/08/06 21:34, chen cheng 写道:
> static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
> {
>          ...
> 
>          if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
>              (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
>              get_reshape_loc(mddev, conf, logical_sector) ==
> LOC_INSIDE_RESHAPE) {
>                  bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
>                  if (rw == WRITE)
>                          md_write_end(mddev);
>                  return true;
>          }
> 
>          if (likely(conf->reshape_progress == MaxSector)) {
>                  ...
>          } else {
>                  add_wait_queue(&conf->wait_for_reshape, &wait);
>                  on_wq = true;
>          }
> 
>          ...
> }
> 
> 
> In raid5_make_request(), if a reshape is progressing and the current
> IO request is not within the reshape range and has the REQ_NOWAIT
> flag, does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of
> REQ_NOWAIT?

The mdraid really doesn't support REQ_NOWAIT, for now the flag is just
ignored and I think BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT should be cleared for raid1/10/456.

BTW, support it will require a lot of work, because IO error handling is
too complicated, we don't want to record badblocks for nowait IO
failure, however, if write disk a succeed while write disk b failed,
whatever we do will violate the semantics of nowait.

Thanks,
Kuai

>  
> .
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-07  1:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-06 13:34 md: Does the thread entering the wait queue violate the semantics of REQ_NOWAIT in raid5_make_request() ? chen cheng
2025-08-07  1:35 ` Yu Kuai

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).