Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ram Ramesh <rramesh2400@gmail.com>
To: Alex <mysqlstudent@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Considering new SATA PCIe card
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:38:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df36257c-1302-ea39-9d9f-f7ed11b0562f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB1R3siNB0u8g+JNcLf+n0BEpUt2HjXam4DmqMXNDuVTjoWaWg@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/24/20 9:28 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>> If plan to use addon cards, please consider LSI SAS9211-8i cards. Well
>>>> supported and reliable.
>>> Oh yes, how quickly I forgot. I actually have one of these in another
>>> server, but I think it's too long to physically fit in the case. Just
>>> to be sure, this is the card you're referencing, right?
>>>
>>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/LSI-SAS-9211-8i-8-port-6G-IT-Raid-Card-ZFS-JBOD-HBA-SAS-SATA6-0-2008-8I/143735992677
>> Yes. Any one of those that mentions this controller and preferably IT
>> (just HBA) firmware instead of IR (Raid) firmware as your raid will be
>> implemented as SW mdraid over JBOD.
> Thanks so much for your help. Are there other similar LSI cards that
> are also well supported?
>
> This looks like a 4-port version of the same card that would certainly fit.
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-H1110-81Y4494-SAS-2-6Gbps-HBA-LSI-9211-4i-P20-IT-Mode-for-ZFS-FreeNAS-unRAID/143488380023
>
> And here's a 1GB cache version?
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/LSI-MegaRaid-SAS-9270CV-8i-1G-Cache-PCI3-0-6Gb-s-Raid-Card-SAS-Controller/143780173461

I am not an expert by any means. I have purchased just one 9211 card and 
it is working well so far. Yes, there are several. I think PCIe version 
may be newer with higher numbered cards, but not sure. In any case, 
vanilla simple 9211 will be more than enough for spinning disks.

I could not figure out if the cache version you list above is meant to 
do HW raid. I was told by those knowledgeable here that HBA or JBOD 
cards are more suitable for mdraid.

Like others have said, this is unlikely to speed up your disk access as 
spinning disks are too slow compared to PCIe/SATA line/cable rates. Buy 
RAM/SSD or do something more fancy  like bcache/lvm cache, if 
performance is a real need vs. feel good state.

Regards
Ramesh


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-25 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25  2:20 Considering new SATA PCIe card Alex
2020-11-25  2:47 ` Ram Ramesh
2020-11-25  3:14   ` Alex
2020-11-25  3:18     ` Ram Ramesh
2020-11-25  3:28       ` Alex
2020-11-25 14:38         ` Ram Ramesh [this message]
2020-11-25  9:31 ` Mateusz
2020-11-25 11:39 ` Tim Small
2020-11-25 14:49 ` Phillip Susi
2020-11-26  2:01   ` Alex

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df36257c-1302-ea39-9d9f-f7ed11b0562f@gmail.com \
    --to=rramesh2400@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mysqlstudent@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox