From: Robin Bowes <robin-lists@robinbowes.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best way to achieve large, expandable, cheap storage?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:41:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dj7vou$o56$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051020111943.GA9757@anthropohedron.net>
Gregory Seidman said the following on 20/10/2005 12:19:
> } PV:
> } /dev/md1 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)
> } /dev/md2 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)
>
> You should at least read the following before using RAID5. You can agree or
> disagree, but you should take the arguments into account:
>
> http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt
This was just an example configuration. My current 1TB array is RAID5
with 1 hot spare but I'll most likely use RAID6 in production.
> } Suppose I then add a new PV:
> } /dev/md3 - 4 x 300GB drives (RAID5 - 900GB total)
>
> You use pvcreate and vgextend to do so, incidentally.
Yes, thanks for the detail.
> } When this finishes, big_vg will contain /dev/md2 + /dev/md3 (1020GB
> } total). /dev/md1 will be unused.
>
> /dev/md1 will still be a part of big_vg, but it won't have any data from
> any LVs on it. You will need to use vgreduce to remove /dev/md1 from the
> VG:
>
> # vgreduce big_vg /dev/md1
Ah, yes, forgot about that step.
Thanks for the validation of the methodology.
I'm going to give this a try on my test server (using much smaller disks!)
Thanks again,
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
is he still wrong?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-20 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-30 13:20 Best way to achieve large, expandable, cheap storage? Robin Bowes
2005-09-30 13:29 ` Robin Bowes
2005-09-30 18:28 ` Brad Dameron
2005-09-30 19:20 ` Dan Stromberg
2005-09-30 18:16 ` Gregory Seidman
2005-09-30 18:34 ` Andy Smith
2005-10-02 4:36 ` Christopher Smith
2005-10-02 7:09 ` Tyler
2005-10-03 3:19 ` Christopher Smith
2005-10-03 16:33 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-10-04 4:09 ` Christopher Smith
2005-10-20 10:23 ` Robin Bowes
2005-10-20 11:19 ` Gregory Seidman
2005-10-20 11:41 ` Robin Bowes [this message]
2005-10-21 4:42 ` Christopher Smith
2005-10-21 16:48 ` Gil
2005-10-21 20:08 ` Robin Bowes
2005-10-21 4:40 ` Christopher Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-27 19:12 Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='dj7vou$o56$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=robin-lists@robinbowes.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).