From: "John Stilson" <john9601@gmail.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 10 resync leading to attempt to access beyond end of device
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:16:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1e9d81a0702190916o3c1511d4q376a25fc4caa6cab@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17877.5679.419453.554504@notabene.brown>
Hey Neil,
I tested this new patch and it seems to work! I'm going to do some
more vigorous testing, and I'll let you know if any more issues bubble
out. Thanks!
-John
On 2/15/07, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thursday February 15, john9601@gmail.com wrote:
> > Ok tried the patch and got a kernel BUG this time (BUG_ON(k == conf->copies)?)
>
> Thanks.... obviously I missed some subtlety. I think I have it right
> now.
> I've tested this against a setup which I think is sufficiently
> identical to yours this time (now that I know what the important
> parameters are: device size), but if you could test it too, that would
> be great.
>
> This patch is in place of the previous patch.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./drivers/md/raid10.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff .prev/drivers/md/raid10.c ./drivers/md/raid10.c
> --- .prev/drivers/md/raid10.c 2007-02-15 13:57:34.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./drivers/md/raid10.c 2007-02-16 13:23:55.000000000 +1100
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_find_virt(conf_t
> if (dev < 0)
> dev += conf->raid_disks;
> } else {
> - while (sector > conf->stride) {
> + while (sector >= conf->stride) {
> sector -= conf->stride;
> if (dev < conf->near_copies)
> dev += conf->raid_disks - conf->near_copies;
> @@ -1747,6 +1747,8 @@ static sector_t sync_request(mddev_t *md
> for (k=0; k<conf->copies; k++)
> if (r10_bio->devs[k].devnum == i)
> break;
> +
> + BUG_ON(k == conf->copies);
> bio = r10_bio->devs[1].bio;
> bio->bi_next = biolist;
> biolist = bio;
> @@ -1967,19 +1969,30 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
> if (!conf->tmppage)
> goto out_free_conf;
>
> + conf->mddev = mddev;
> + conf->raid_disks = mddev->raid_disks;
> conf->near_copies = nc;
> conf->far_copies = fc;
> conf->copies = nc*fc;
> conf->far_offset = fo;
> conf->chunk_mask = (sector_t)(mddev->chunk_size>>9)-1;
> conf->chunk_shift = ffz(~mddev->chunk_size) - 9;
> + size = mddev->size >> (conf->chunk_shift-1);
> + sector_div(size, fc);
> + size = size * conf->raid_disks;
> + sector_div(size, nc);
> + /* 'size' is now the number of chunks in the array */
> + /* calculate "used chunks per device" in 'stride' */
> + stride = size * conf->copies;
> + sector_div(stride, conf->raid_disks);
> + mddev->size = stride << (conf->chunk_shift-1);
> +
> if (fo)
> - conf->stride = 1 << conf->chunk_shift;
> - else {
> - stride = mddev->size >> (conf->chunk_shift-1);
> + stride = 1;
> + else
> sector_div(stride, fc);
> - conf->stride = stride << conf->chunk_shift;
> - }
> + conf->stride = stride << conf->chunk_shift;
> +
> conf->r10bio_pool = mempool_create(NR_RAID10_BIOS, r10bio_pool_alloc,
> r10bio_pool_free, conf);
> if (!conf->r10bio_pool) {
> @@ -2009,8 +2022,6 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
>
> disk->head_position = 0;
> }
> - conf->raid_disks = mddev->raid_disks;
> - conf->mddev = mddev;
> spin_lock_init(&conf->device_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conf->retry_list);
>
> @@ -2052,16 +2063,8 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
> /*
> * Ok, everything is just fine now
> */
> - if (conf->far_offset) {
> - size = mddev->size >> (conf->chunk_shift-1);
> - size *= conf->raid_disks;
> - size <<= conf->chunk_shift;
> - sector_div(size, conf->far_copies);
> - } else
> - size = conf->stride * conf->raid_disks;
> - sector_div(size, conf->near_copies);
> - mddev->array_size = size/2;
> - mddev->resync_max_sectors = size;
> + mddev->array_size = size << (conf->chunk_shift-1);
> + mddev->resync_max_sectors = size << conf->chunk_shift;
>
> mddev->queue->issue_flush_fn = raid10_issue_flush;
> mddev->queue->backing_dev_info.congested_fn = raid10_congested;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-19 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-14 22:08 RAID 10 resync leading to attempt to access beyond end of device John Stilson
2007-02-14 23:37 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <e1e9d81a0702141606r7dea6288qea942cee2d978ee2@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <17875.57273.543122.581106@notabene.brown>
[not found] ` <e1e9d81a0702142051v152c4c8dme2b20e1c53e1f4b2@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-15 18:02 ` John Stilson
2007-02-15 18:23 ` John Stilson
2007-02-15 18:28 ` (unknown) Derek Yeung
2007-02-15 18:53 ` (unknown) Derek Yeung
2007-02-16 2:25 ` RAID 10 resync leading to attempt to access beyond end of device Neil Brown
2007-02-19 17:16 ` John Stilson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1e9d81a0702190916o3c1511d4q376a25fc4caa6cab@mail.gmail.com \
--to=john9601@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).