linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:40:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4f231db-6e4b-3d7f-e7a0-362dc4441823@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148026435214.19980.7956943898609877817.stgit@buzz>

On 2016/11/28 上午12:32, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Current implementation employ 16bit counter of active stripes in lower
> bits of bio->bi_phys_segments. If request is big enough to overflow
> this counter bio will be completed and freed too early.
> 
> Fortunately this not happens in default configuration because several
> other limits prevent that: stripe_cache_size * nr_disks effectively
> limits count of active stripes. And small max_sectors_kb at lower
> disks prevent that during normal read/write operations.
> 
> Overflow easily happens in discard if it's enabled by module parameter
> "devices_handle_discard_safely" and stripe_cache_size is set big enough.
> 
> This patch limits requests size with 256Mb - 8Kb to prevent overflows.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c |    9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 92ac251e91e6..cce6057b9aca 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -6984,6 +6984,15 @@ static int raid5_run(struct mddev *mddev)
>  			stripe = (stripe | (stripe-1)) + 1;
>  		mddev->queue->limits.discard_alignment = stripe;
>  		mddev->queue->limits.discard_granularity = stripe;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We use 16-bit counter of active stripes in bi_phys_segments
> +		 * (minus one for over-loaded initialization)
> +		 */
> +		blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, 0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
> +		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue,
> +					      0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
> +

Could you please to explain why use 0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS here ?

Thanks.

Coly


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-27 16:32 [PATCH] md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-11-28  4:40 ` Coly Li [this message]
2016-11-28  6:06   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-11-29 23:52 ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4f231db-6e4b-3d7f-e7a0-362dc4441823@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).