From: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
To: Daniel Jones <dj@iowni.com>
Cc: antlists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Requesting assistance recovering RAID-5 array
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:00:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e77280ef-a5ac-f2d8-332c-dec032ddc842@turmel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB00BMg50zcerSLHShSjoOcaJ0JQSi2aSqTFfU2eQQrT12-qEg@mail.gmail.com>
Good morning Daniel,
On 3/30/20 10:09 PM, Daniel Jones wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>> In particular, knowledge of the filesystem or nested structure (LVM?) present on the array will be needed to identify the real data offsets of the three mangled members.
>
> I don't have the history of original creation, but I'm fairly certain
> it was something straightforward like:
>
> mdadm --create /dev/md0 {parameters}
> sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0
> mount /dev/md0 /mnt/raid5
>
> After the array was corrupted I needed to comment out the mount from
> my fstab, which was as follows (confirming ext4):
>
> /dev/md0 /mnt/raid5
> ext4 defaults 0 0
Ok. This should be relatively easy, if a bit time consuming. Things we
know:
1) array layout, and chunk size: 512k or 1024 sectors
2) Active device #1 offset 261124 sectors.
3) The array had bad block logging turned on. We won't re-enable this
mis-feature. It is default, so you must turn it off in your --create.
Things we don't know:
1) Data offsets for other drives. However, the one we know appears to
be the typical you'd get from one reshape after a modern default
creation (262144). There are good odds that the others are at this
offset, except the newest one that might be at 262144. You'll have to
test four combinations: all at 261124 plus one at a time at 262144.
2) Member order for the other drives. Three drives taken three at a
time is six combinations.
3) Identity of the first drive kicked out. (Or do we know?) If not
known, there's four more combinations: whether to leave out or one of
three left out.
That yields either twenty-four or 96 different --create --assume-clean
combinations to test to find the one that gives you the cleanest
filesystem in a read-only fsck. (Do NOT mount! Even a read-only mount
will write to the filesystem. Only test with fsck -n.)
Start by creating partitions on all devices, preferably at 2048 sectors.
(Should be the default offered.) Use data offsets 259076 and 260100
instead of 261124 and 262144.
I recommend writing out all the combinations before you start and
keeping the fsck -n output from each until you have the final version
you want.
Yeah, I'd write a script to do it all for me, if your best guess
combination doesn't yield a good filesystem.
> Cheers,
> DJ
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-31 0:04 Requesting assistance recovering RAID-5 array Daniel Jones
2020-03-31 0:24 ` antlists
2020-03-31 0:51 ` Daniel Jones
2020-03-31 1:27 ` crowston.name
2020-03-31 1:50 ` Phil Turmel
2020-03-31 1:48 ` Phil Turmel
2020-03-31 2:09 ` Daniel Jones
2020-03-31 12:00 ` Phil Turmel [this message]
2020-03-31 13:36 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-01 3:39 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-01 4:45 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-01 6:03 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-01 12:15 ` Wols Lists
2020-04-01 12:55 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-01 15:21 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-01 15:38 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-01 15:39 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-01 18:07 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-01 18:32 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-03 18:29 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-03 18:34 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-03 18:42 ` Daniel Jones
2020-04-03 18:43 ` Phil Turmel
2020-04-03 20:13 ` Adam Goryachev
2020-04-03 20:14 ` Phil Turmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e77280ef-a5ac-f2d8-332c-dec032ddc842@turmel.org \
--to=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=dj@iowni.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox