From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, maciej.sosnowski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 1 of 2)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:08:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20903191008y5262a991ufefd17254075c977@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ljr21jo4.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
>
>> This series constitutes the pieces of the raid6 acceleration work that are
>> aimed at the next merge window. It implements:
>> 1/ An api for asynchronous raid6 parity generation and recovery routines
>
> Could you please comment a bit how well the default load balancing works. If
> I write a single stream from a single CPU will it use multiple CPU
> cores in the system to do the RAID6 work?
No, that is an item for the todo list. This implementation is only
asynchronous when a raid6 hardware offload resource is available, when
this is not the case it runs synchronous/single-threaded. In general
the api is meant to inherit the load balancing of the caller. For
md/raid6 this is currently always single threaded for writes and
degraded reads regardless of the number of requesting threads.
This work does make some progress towards multithreaded raid6 in that
calculations can now be preempted (i.e. no longer performed under the
stripe spin_lock).
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 19:20 [PATCH 00/13] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 1 of 2) Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] md/raid6: move raid6 data processing to raid6_pq.ko Dan Williams
2009-03-19 20:09 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-22 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] async_tx: don't use src_list argument of async_xor() for dma addresses Dan Williams
2009-03-19 20:10 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-25 17:11 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-26 10:39 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] async_tx: provide __async_inline for HAS_DMA=n archs Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] async_tx: kill needless module_{init|exit} Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 05/13] async_tx: add sum check flags Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] async_tx: add support for asynchronous GF multiplication Dan Williams
2009-03-19 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-19 17:20 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-20 22:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-20 23:00 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-20 23:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-21 0:06 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-21 2:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-21 10:19 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-21 19:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-21 15:19 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-21 19:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-21 22:14 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-21 22:26 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-21 22:46 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-21 20:05 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-21 22:00 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-21 22:43 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-21 22:53 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-22 21:37 ` Ilya Yanok
2009-03-19 20:09 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-30 14:30 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] async_tx: add support for asynchronous RAID6 recovery operations Dan Williams
2009-03-23 10:11 ` Andre Noll
2009-03-30 14:30 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2009-03-18 19:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] iop-adma: P+Q support for iop13xx adma engines Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:21 ` [PATCH 09/13] iop-adma: P+Q self test Dan Williams
2009-03-20 0:14 ` Neil Brown
2009-03-20 0:19 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-30 14:30 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2009-03-18 19:21 ` [PATCH 10/13] dmaengine: allow dma support for async_tx to be toggled Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:21 ` [PATCH 11/13] dmatest: add xor test Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:21 ` [PATCH 12/13] dmatest: add dma interrupts and callbacks Dan Williams
2009-03-18 19:21 ` [PATCH 13/13] dmatest: add pq support Dan Williams
2009-03-18 23:43 ` [PATCH 00/13] Asynchronous raid6 acceleration (part 1 of 2) Andi Kleen
2009-03-19 17:08 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-03-20 0:30 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9c3a7c20903191008y5262a991ufefd17254075c977@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.sosnowski@intel.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).