* Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ?
@ 2006-07-24 18:46 Mark Hellman
2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hellman @ 2006-07-24 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I am in the process of deciding which SATA-II drives should I choose for an
external RAID system. I heard that it was safer to choose drives from
different manufacturers to reduce the chance of near-simultaneous failure
due to model-specific issues.
Is this so?
And are there other potential problems related with choosing drives from
different manufacturers?
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ?
2006-07-24 18:46 Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ? Mark Hellman
@ 2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
2006-07-24 21:51 ` Jeff Breidenbach
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Smith @ 2006-07-24 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:46:21PM +0100, Mark Hellman wrote:
> I am in the process of deciding which SATA-II drives should I choose for an
> external RAID system. I heard that it was safer to choose drives from
> different manufacturers to reduce the chance of near-simultaneous failure
> due to model-specific issues.
> Is this so?
It's certainly safer.. whether you think it is worth the trouble is
your call.
> And are there other potential problems related with choosing drives from
> different manufacturers?
The only issue is the obvious one that the manufacturers are usually
fairly vague about the exact usable size of each disk. If you
bought half the disks from one manufacturer and half from another
then you should be able to pair them up and use the minimum of the
size of each pair.
Cheers,
Andy
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ?
2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
@ 2006-07-24 21:51 ` Jeff Breidenbach
2006-07-24 21:54 ` hahn
2006-07-25 11:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Breidenbach @ 2006-07-24 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
> The only issue is the obvious one that the manufacturers are usually
> fairly vague about the exact usable size of each disk. If you
> bought half the disks from one manufacturer and half from another
> then you should be able to pair them up and use the minimum of the
> size of each pair.
In a similar vein, if the drives have different speeds and you may be
wasting some performance. The faster drives may be forced to
sit around waiting for an I/O operation to complete on the slowpoke.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ?
2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
2006-07-24 21:51 ` Jeff Breidenbach
@ 2006-07-24 21:54 ` hahn
2006-07-25 11:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hahn @ 2006-07-24 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
>> I am in the process of deciding which SATA-II drives should I choose for an
>> external RAID system. I heard that it was safer to choose drives from
>> different manufacturers to reduce the chance of near-simultaneous failure
>> due to model-specific issues.
>> Is this so?
>
> It's certainly safer.. whether you think it is worth the trouble is
> your call.
it would be great to know the numbers. I WAG that this pretty
theoretical model-specific failure mode is insignificant compared
to environment or wear/load-specific ones. I can imagine the former
was more of a concern in the days of disks on shared buses (SCSI, FC,
even IDE), when a model-specific response to some protocol oddity
might cause group failures.
nowadays, a SATA disk will probably share power, air, vibration with
its peers, and in some sense, IO load. but I suspect there's enough
variance in the latter to make synchronized dying uncommon. at least
short-scale synchrony. vendor would be much less relevant to
power/air/vibration issues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ?
2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
2006-07-24 21:51 ` Jeff Breidenbach
2006-07-24 21:54 ` hahn
@ 2006-07-25 11:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2006-07-25 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Smith; +Cc: linux-raid
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:46:21PM +0100, Mark Hellman wrote:
>> I am in the process of deciding which SATA-II drives should I choose for an
>> external RAID system. I heard that it was safer to choose drives from
>> different manufacturers to reduce the chance of near-simultaneous failure
>> due to model-specific issues.
>> Is this so?
>
> It's certainly safer.. whether you think it is worth the trouble is
> your call.
>
>> And are there other potential problems related with choosing drives from
>> different manufacturers?
>
> The only issue is the obvious one that the manufacturers are usually
> fairly vague about the exact usable size of each disk. If you
> bought half the disks from one manufacturer and half from another
> then you should be able to pair them up and use the minimum of the
> size of each pair.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
So far the WD 400GB -KD drives and Seagate 400GB seem to have the same
amount of sectors.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-25 11:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-24 18:46 Drives of same model in RAID 1/10 ? Mark Hellman
2006-07-24 21:43 ` Andy Smith
2006-07-24 21:51 ` Jeff Breidenbach
2006-07-24 21:54 ` hahn
2006-07-25 11:48 ` Justin Piszcz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).