Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
	Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: The read data is wrong from raid5 when recovery happens
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 11:09:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebe7fa31-2e9a-74da-bbbd-3d5238590a7c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALTww28aV5CGXQAu46Rkc=fG1jK=ARzCT8VGoVyje8kQdqEXMg@mail.gmail.com>



On 5/26/23 09:49, Xiao Ni wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We found a problem recently. The read data is wrong when recovery happens.
> Now we've found it's introduced by patch 10764815f (md: add io accounting
> for raid0 and raid5). I can reproduce this 100%. This problem exists in
> upstream. The test steps are like this:
>
> 1. mdadm -CR $devname -l5 -n4 /dev/sd[b-e] --force --assume-clean
> 2. mkfs.ext4 -F $devname
> 3. mount $devname $mount_point
> 4. mdadm --incremental --fail sdd
> 5. dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/pythontest/file1 bs=1M count=100000
> status=progress
> 6. mdadm /dev/md126 --add /dev/sdd
> 7. create 31 processes that writes and reads. It compares the content with
> md5sum. The test will go on until the recovery stops
> 8. wait for about 10 minutes, we can see some processes report checksum is
> wrong. But if it re-read the data again, the checksum will be good.
>
> I tried to narrow this problem like this:
>
> -       md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
> +       if (rw == WRITE)
> +               md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
> If it only do account for write requests, the problem can disappear.
>
> -       if (rw == READ && mddev->degraded == 0 &&
> -           mddev->reshape_position == MaxSector) {
> -               bi = chunk_aligned_read(mddev, bi);
> -               if (!bi)
> -                       return true;
> -       }
> +       //if (rw == READ && mddev->degraded == 0 &&
> +       //    mddev->reshape_position == MaxSector) {
> +       //      bi = chunk_aligned_read(mddev, bi);
> +       //      if (!bi)
> +       //              return true;
> +       //}
>
>          if (unlikely(bio_op(bi) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)) {
>                  make_discard_request(mddev, bi);
> @@ -6180,7 +6180,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev,
> struct bio * bi)
>                          md_write_end(mddev);
>                  return true;
>          }
> -       md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
> +       if (rw == READ)
> +               md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
>
> I comment the chunk_aligned_read out and only account for read requests,
> this problem can be reproduced.

After a quick look,raid5_read_one_chunk clones bio by itself, so no need to
do it for the chunk aligned readcase. Could you pls try this?

--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -6120,6 +6120,7 @@static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, 
struct bio * bi)
        const int rw = bio_data_dir(bi);
        enum stripe_result res;
        int s, stripe_cnt;
+bool account_bio = true;

        if (unlikely(bi->bi_opf & REQ_PREFLUSH)) {
                int ret = log_handle_flush_request(conf, bi);
@@ -6148,6 +6149,7 @@static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, 
struct bio * bi)
        if (rw == READ && mddev->degraded == 0 &&
            mddev->reshape_position == MaxSector) {
                bi = chunk_aligned_read(mddev, bi);
+account_bio = false;
                if (!bi)
                        return true;
        }
@@ -6180,7 +6182,8 @@static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, 
struct bio * bi)
                        md_write_end(mddev);
                return true;
        }
-       md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);
+if (account_bio)
+md_account_bio(mddev, &bi);


Thanks,
Guoqing

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-26  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CALTww28aV5CGXQAu46Rkc=fG1jK=ARzCT8VGoVyje8kQdqEXMg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-05-26  2:08 ` Fwd: The read data is wrong from raid5 when recovery happens Xiao Ni
2023-05-26  2:17   ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-26  2:40     ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-26  2:47       ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-26  3:02         ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-26  3:56   ` d tbsky
2023-05-26  6:20     ` Xiao Ni
2024-02-14 15:15   ` Fwd: " Mateusz Kusiak
2024-02-14 17:12     ` Song Liu
     [not found]     ` <CALTww29s1WupaVRSrEX1GbD=1Bt7b5cxseDnBLARkH1uHUhtCA@mail.gmail.com>
2024-02-15 10:41       ` Mateusz Kusiak
2023-05-26  3:09 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2023-05-26  6:45   ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-26  7:12     ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-26  7:23       ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-26  9:13         ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-05-26 21:13           ` Song Liu
2023-05-27  0:56             ` Xiao Ni
2023-07-11  0:39               ` Xiao Ni
2023-07-14  1:30                 ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-29  2:25         ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-29  3:41           ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-29  8:33             ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-29  8:40               ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-30  1:36                 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-30  2:02                   ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-30  2:11                     ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-30  2:23                       ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-30  2:30                         ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-30  2:43                           ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-06-14  8:27                           ` Kusiak, Mateusz
2023-06-14  8:46                             ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-29 13:51           ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-30  0:53             ` Guoqing Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebe7fa31-2e9a-74da-bbbd-3d5238590a7c@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncroxon@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox