From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remark and RFC
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:11:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec1tep$rmm$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200608160906.k7G96A204753@inv.it.uc3m.es
Peter T. Breuer <ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> 1) I would like raid request retries to be done with exponential
> delays, so that we get a chance to overcome network brownouts.
Hmmm, IMHO this should be implemented in nbd/enbd where it belongs to
and errors should be masked within nbd/enbd then. Since (at least) md
has no read-timeouts or something like that (please correct me if I'm
wrong), this should be no big issue.
Typically, storage media communication channels are loss-free, so either
a read is okay or it fails. A storage media usually has no retry-on-
timeout semantics, so upper layers are with high probability not aware
of such a thing. This is the same with RAID as well as with filesystems,
so if you run an ext2 or something like that on top of your enbd you
should suffer from the same problems: if a read fails, the filesystem
goes dead, gets remounted read-only or follows whatever error-strategy
you have it configured for.
regards
Mario
--
() Ascii Ribbon Campaign
/\ Support plain text e-mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 9:06 remark and RFC Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-16 10:00 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-08-16 13:06 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-16 14:28 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-08-16 19:01 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-16 21:19 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-08-16 22:19 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-16 23:43 ` Nix
2006-08-16 14:59 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-08-16 16:10 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-17 1:11 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-17 6:28 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-19 1:35 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-08-19 11:27 ` Peter T. Breuer
2006-08-21 1:21 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-17 14:11 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [this message]
[not found] <62b0912f0608160746l34d4e5e5r6219cc2e0f4a9040@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-16 16:15 ` Peter T. Breuer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-18 7:51 Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ec1tep$rmm$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=mario.holbe@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).