From: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@fnnas.com>
To: <linan666@huaweicloud.com>, <song@kernel.org>, <xni@redhat.com>,
<linan122@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<bugreports61@gmail.com>, <yukuai@fnnas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] md: Fix forward incompatibility from configurable logical block size
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:39:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4fba874-9ad7-4efd-9240-79c452494b8a@fnnas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219092127.1815922-2-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Hi,
在 2025/12/19 17:21, linan666@huaweicloud.com 写道:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
>
> Commit 62ed1b582246 ("md: allow configuring logical block size") used
> reserved pad to add 'logical_block_size' to metadata. RAID rejects
> non-zero reserved pad, so arrays fail when rolling back to old kernels
> after booting new ones.
>
> Set 'logical_block_size' only for newly created arrays to support rollback
> to old kernels. Importantly new arrays still won't work on old kernels to
> prevent data loss issue from LBS changes.
>
> For arrays created on old kernels which confirmed not to rollback,
> configure LBS by echo 'enable' to md/logical_block_size.
>
> Fixes: 62ed1b582246 ("md: allow configuring logical block size")
> Reported-by: BugReports <bugreports61@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/825e532d-d1e1-44bb-5581-692b7c091796@huaweicloud.com/T/#t
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 7c0dd94a4d25..28c9435016fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -2014,8 +2014,14 @@ static int super_1_validate(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *freshest, struc
>
> mddev->max_disks = (4096-256)/2;
>
> - if (!mddev->logical_block_size)
> + if (!mddev->logical_block_size) {
> mddev->logical_block_size = le32_to_cpu(sb->logical_block_size);
> + if (!mddev->logical_block_size)
> + pr_warn("%s: echo 'enable' to md/logical_block_size to prevent data loss issue from LBS changes.\n"
> + " Note: After enable, array will not be assembled in old kernels (<= 6.18)\n",
> + mdname(mddev));
Looks like this will print the same message for every rdev added to this array, please move the warning to
mddev_stack_rdev_limits() as well.
> + }
> +
>
> if ((le32_to_cpu(sb->feature_map) & MD_FEATURE_BITMAP_OFFSET) &&
> mddev->bitmap_info.file == NULL) {
> @@ -5983,8 +5989,27 @@ lbs_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
> if (mddev->major_version == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (mddev->pers)
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (mddev->pers) {
> + if (mddev->logical_block_size)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + /*
> + * To fix forward compatibility issues, LBS is not
> + * configured in old kernels array (<=6.18) by default.
> + * If the user confirms no rollback to old kernels,
> + * enable LBS by writing "enable" — to prevent data
> + * loss from LBS changes.
> + */
> + if (cmd_match(buf, "enable")) {
> + mddev->logical_block_size =
> + queue_logical_block_size(mddev->gendisk->queue);
> + set_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS, &mddev->sb_flags);
> + pr_info("%s: config logical block size success, array will not be assembled in old kernels (<= 6.18)\n",
> + mdname(mddev));
Instead of a new string "enabled", I'll prefer to echo the exact lbs.
> + return len;
> + } else {
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + }
>
> err = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &lbs);
> if (err < 0)
> @@ -6165,7 +6190,18 @@ int mddev_stack_rdev_limits(struct mddev *mddev, struct queue_limits *lim,
> mdname(mddev));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - mddev->logical_block_size = lim->logical_block_size;
> +
> + /*
> + * Fix forward compatibility issue. Only set LBS by default for
> + * new array, mddev->events == 0 indicates the array was just
> + * created. When assembling an array, read LBS from the superblock
> + * instead — LBS is 0 in superblocks created by old kernels.
> + */
> + if (!mddev->events && mddev->major_version == 1) {
> + pr_info("%s: array will not be assembled in old kernels that lack configurable lbs support (<= 6.18)\n",
> + mdname(mddev));
> + mddev->logical_block_size = lim->logical_block_size;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Thansk,
Kuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-25 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 9:21 [PATCH 1/2] md: Fix logical_block_size configuration being overwritten linan666
2025-12-19 9:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] md: Fix forward incompatibility from configurable logical block size linan666
2025-12-25 8:39 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2025-12-25 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] md: Fix logical_block_size configuration being overwritten Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4fba874-9ad7-4efd-9240-79c452494b8a@fnnas.com \
--to=yukuai@fnnas.com \
--cc=bugreports61@gmail.com \
--cc=linan122@huawei.com \
--cc=linan666@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox