From: Roland <devzero@web.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: status of bugzilla #99171 - mdraid broken for O_DIRECT
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 22:18:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc14e278-34d0-408c-93ef-ad22a42e87fd@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92bc9643-53fe-4c56-abdd-7a9efb451f1c@suse.de>
good evening,
are you really sure fs-fsdevel is the right place to report this?
i just was able to reproduce the mdraid breakage without any filesystem
involved, just put lvm on top of mdraid and passed lvm logical volumes
from that to the debian vm, and then ran "break-raid-odirect /dev/sdb"
inside vm.
meanwhile, btrfs issue with O_DIRECT seems to be fixed, at least from
my quick tests, reported at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99171#c35 . btrfs fix is
also linked there.
regards
Roland
Am 16.10.25 um 08:02 schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> On 10/16/25 01:09, Roland wrote:
> [ .. ]>
>> thank you for your feedback.
>>
>> i see, things are complicated and O_DIRECT is a very special beast....
>>
>> meanwhile, i gave bcachefs a try today , because it looks interesting .
>>
>> like zfs, it does not seem to be affected by this problem, at least
>> from my first tests reported at
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi? id=99171#c26 (i hope this
>> is a valid test for consistency)
>>
>> so we have at least a second "software raid" technology besides zfs,
>> which does NOT suffer from the "by design" O_DIRECT breakage.
>>
>> that's at least surprising me, as bcachefs is far from production
>> ready, and i wonder why it just seems to work at this early stage of
>> development.
>>
> Hmm. True.
>
> I would suggest bringing up this topic on linux-fsdevel; there is
> always a chance that there is a bug somewhere.
> At least some explanation would be warranted why bcachefs does not
> suffer from this issue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <A4168F21-4CDF-4BAD-8754-30BAA1315C6F@web.de>
2025-10-14 20:14 ` status of bugzilla #99171 - mdraid broken for O_DIRECT Roland
2025-10-15 6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-15 23:09 ` Roland
2025-10-16 6:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-17 20:18 ` Roland [this message]
2025-10-20 6:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-09 20:08 Roland
2024-10-09 21:38 ` Reindl Harald
2024-10-10 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-10 7:29 ` Roland
2024-10-10 8:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-11 19:25 ` Roland
2025-10-13 6:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-13 19:06 ` Roland
[not found] ` <6fb3e2cb-8eeb-4e76-9364-16348d807784@web.de>
2025-10-14 6:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc14e278-34d0-408c-93ef-ad22a42e87fd@web.de \
--to=devzero@web.de \
--cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox