public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland <devzero@web.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: status of bugzilla #99171 - mdraid broken for O_DIRECT
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 22:18:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc14e278-34d0-408c-93ef-ad22a42e87fd@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92bc9643-53fe-4c56-abdd-7a9efb451f1c@suse.de>

good evening,

are you really sure fs-fsdevel is the right place to report this?

i just was able to reproduce the mdraid breakage without any filesystem 
involved,  just put lvm on top of mdraid and passed lvm logical volumes 
from that to the debian vm, and then ran "break-raid-odirect /dev/sdb" 
inside vm.

meanwhile,  btrfs issue with O_DIRECT seems to be fixed,  at least from 
my quick tests, reported at 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99171#c35 . btrfs fix is 
also linked there.

regards
Roland

Am 16.10.25 um 08:02 schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> On 10/16/25 01:09, Roland wrote:
> [ .. ]>
>> thank you for your feedback.
>>
>> i see, things are complicated and O_DIRECT is a very special beast....
>>
>> meanwhile, i gave bcachefs a try today , because it looks interesting .
>>
>> like zfs, it does not seem to be affected by this problem, at least 
>> from my first tests reported at 
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi? id=99171#c26 (i hope this 
>> is a valid test for consistency)
>>
>> so we have at least a second "software raid" technology besides zfs, 
>> which does NOT suffer from the "by design" O_DIRECT breakage.
>>
>> that's at least surprising me, as bcachefs is far from production 
>> ready,  and i wonder why it just seems to work at this early stage of 
>> development.
>>
> Hmm. True.
>
> I would suggest bringing up this topic on linux-fsdevel; there is
> always a chance that there is a bug somewhere.
> At least some explanation would be warranted why bcachefs does not
> suffer from this issue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <A4168F21-4CDF-4BAD-8754-30BAA1315C6F@web.de>
2025-10-14 20:14 ` status of bugzilla #99171 - mdraid broken for O_DIRECT Roland
2025-10-15  6:56   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-15 23:09     ` Roland
2025-10-16  6:02       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-17 20:18         ` Roland [this message]
2025-10-20  6:44           ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-09 20:08 Roland
2024-10-09 21:38 ` Reindl Harald
2024-10-10  6:53   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-10  7:29     ` Roland
2024-10-10  8:34       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-11 19:25         ` Roland
2025-10-13  6:48           ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-13 19:06             ` Roland
     [not found]             ` <6fb3e2cb-8eeb-4e76-9364-16348d807784@web.de>
2025-10-14  6:31               ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc14e278-34d0-408c-93ef-ad22a42e87fd@web.de \
    --to=devzero@web.de \
    --cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox