From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:35:12 +0100
Message-ID: <fd8d0180601050335ob7b791cm@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fd8d0180601050104x15079396h@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fd8d0180601050106s5f5b4306o@mail.gmail.com>
	 <87oe2r2d93.fsf@rimspace.net> <43BD026C.4050705@panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <43BD026C.4050705@panix.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

2006/1/5, berk walker <berk@panix.com>:
[...]
> >
> >
> Ext3 does have a fine record.  Might I also suggest an added expense of
> 18 1/2% and do RAID6 for better protection against data loss?
> b-
>

Well, I guess so. I just hope I'll be given enough money for it, since
it increases the cost per GB. Anyway I guess that it is preferable
than a raid5 + 1 spare.
By the way, not really a raid-oriented question, but what is the exact
robustness of ext3 resizing ? I mean : what happens if the box crashes
while resizing an ext3 ?
This implies, of course, resizing capabilities for raid6, which is not
implement yet. Is it ?