From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 4 disks: RAID-6 or RAID-10 ..
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:07:31 +0100
Message-ID: <fd8d0180602170407ib160644v@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0602171100420.22063@lion.drogon.net>
	 <43F5B707.3030005@panix.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.56.0602171153090.22063@lion.drogon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0602171153090.22063@lion.drogon.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Gordon Henderson <gordon@drogon.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

2006/2/17, Gordon Henderson <gordon@drogon.net>:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, berk walker wrote:
>
> > RAID-6 *will* give you your required 2-drive redundancy.
>
Anyway, if you wish to resize your setup to 5 drives one day or
another, I guess raid 6 would be preferable, because one day or
another, a patch will popup and make raid6 resizing possible. Or won't
it ?