From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEFE320A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 02:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712802364; cv=none; b=KEMi7PwQk4GunyntcqnsEMwZvJvAheB5gVE5Hlh7/JcvdUtF+hPkZIcHFyXCvcuvtVsXyAY+ERehciggM93fuheUQLRQZaKCjA2U4kyUBVTKuB/l/YLolFSkSQHXrX4AeRQEZW6+nqvsfAjKbL5jL2W2VHc53/S1rQI9lDhhKGQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712802364; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k3v5LMib7RHDEOkyDWg5qUoIM6psw3yaI/YyEFsKT1k=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mJEZpPFcNoU0yzsfmlaT6buUCa//t07vVHYDFrGKtOdW2u7Ke2MRwsdDDDTR/7Rlihc3Yt6CWLWDvjooEcFSnEHq0WKN8cnrBmyjP7W1j1F8yg/fAngDA1cK415ZBXgvICwARmN+8505Q1Eu4sNahmtR6cd3RiP/Owgl5B3XYlc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VFNpk192Tz4f3m6s for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:25:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.75]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06DF1A0199 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:25:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.247] (unknown [10.174.179.247]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgDH6w41Shdm+z6BJw--.36063S3; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:25:58 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:25:57 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: regression: drive was detected as raid member due to metadata on partition To: =?UTF-8?Q?Sven_K=c3=b6hler?= , Li Nan , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org References: <93d95bbe-f804-4d12-bd0d-7d3cc82650b3@gmail.com> <90ebc7c2-624c-934b-1b5b-e8efccfda209@huaweicloud.com> <08a82e10-dc6b-41f9-976a-e86a59cfd54d@gmail.com> From: Li Nan In-Reply-To: <08a82e10-dc6b-41f9-976a-e86a59cfd54d@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:Syh0CgDH6w41Shdm+z6BJw--.36063S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7tFW7Kw1UCF18tFy8KrW7Jwb_yoW8AF4rpr s2yw1rKryDJw1kGa1UGr1Ut34UJr1kJ345JFWDJFy8Jr4UXrnFgw4UXF42gr4DXF4fAF15 X3Z8Grn0vr13Gr7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvE14x267AKxVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1lnxkEFVAIw20F6cxK64vIFxWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xv F2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r 4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v 4I1lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbV WUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF 67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42 IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1l IxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWI evJa73UjIFyTuYvjfU5sqWUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: polqt0awwwqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ Hi, 在 2024/4/11 4:59, Sven Köhler 写道: > Hi, > > Am 10.04.24 um 03:56 schrieb Li Nan: >> Hi, Köhler >> >> 在 2024/4/9 7:31, Sven Köhler 写道: [...] > > I should have mentioned the mdadm and kernel version. I am using mdadm > 4.3-2 and linux-lts 6.6.23-1 on Arch Linux. > > I created the array very similar to what you did: > mdadm --create /dev/md4 --level=6 --raid-devices=4 --metadata=0.90 > /dev/sd[abcd]4 > > My mdadm.conf looks like this: > DEVICE partitions > ARRAY /dev/md/4 metadata=0.90  UUID=... > > And /proc/partitions looks like this: > > major minor  #blocks  name >    8        0 2930266584 sda >    8        1    1048576 sda1 >    8        2   33554432 sda2 >    8        3   10485760 sda3 >    8        4 2885176775 sda4 >    8       16 2930266584 sdb >    8       17    1048576 sdb1 >    8       18   33554432 sdb2 >    8       19   10485760 sdb3 >    8       20 2885176775 sdb4 >    8       32 2930266584 sdc >    8       33    1048576 sdc1 >    8       34   33554432 sdc2 >    8       35   10485760 sdc3 >    8       36 2885176775 sdc4 >    8       48 2930266584 sdd >    8       49    1048576 sdd1 >    8       50   33554432 sdd2 >    8       51   10485760 sdd3 >    8       52 2885176775 sdd4 > > > Interestingly, sda, sdb, etc. are included. So "DEVICE partitions" actually > considers them. > I used your command and config, updated kernel and mdadm, but raid also created correctly after reboot. My OS is fedora, it may have been affected by some other system tools? I have no idea. -- Thanks, Nan