From: Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Raid and badblocks
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:09:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gv5q3p$vof$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
We have a linux RAID 5 md setup with 10 disks controlled using a 3ware
9650se card. Here is /proc/mdstat:
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdb1[0] sdk1[9] sdj1[8] sdi1[7] sdh1[6] sdg1[5] sdf1[4]
sde1[3] sdd1[2] sdc1[1]
8788959360 blocks level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2 [10/10] [UUUUUUUUUU]
The built-in 3ware autoverify feature found some bad blocks on sdj. To try
to correct these I ran:
echo repair > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
This completed with no errors, but the bad blocks have not gone away.
Smartctl has these entries:
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 1
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000 Old_age Offline
- 1
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours)
LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 961
1953103085
I also tried a check on md0, but it found no errors. If I run a badblocks
read test directly on sdj, it finds bad blocks. A smartctl long test also
finds the problems.
Isn't the check/repair supposed to find bad blocks and report/repair them? I
thought a check would read all the data off all the disks and check for
inconsistencies. How can I get these bad blocks repaired?
The kernel is Fedora 10, 2.6.29.2-52.fc10.x86_64.
Thanks
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Sanders <jss@ast.cam.ac.uk> http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-22 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 9:09 Jeremy Sanders [this message]
2009-05-22 9:19 ` Raid and badblocks Jeremy Sanders
2009-05-22 11:50 ` NeilBrown
2009-05-26 12:59 ` Jeremy Sanders
2009-05-26 15:27 ` Andrew Burgess
2009-05-30 10:13 ` hank peng
2009-05-30 13:29 ` John Robinson
2009-05-30 14:21 ` Sujit Karataparambil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='gv5q3p$vof$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=jss@ast.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).