From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: What's the typical RAID10 setup? Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:05:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20110131152151.GD7861@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <4D470F96.40409@cfl.rr.com> <4D471A41.1090706@hardwarefreak.com> <4D4730C0.8080900@cfl.rr.com> <4D473A02.3070809@cfl.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D473A02.3070809@cfl.rr.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 31/01/2011 23:38, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 1/31/2011 5:08 PM, Jon Nelson wrote: >> I operate (and have done so for a long time) a raid10,f2 on two drives. >> What makes you think it wants at least 3? > > Neat, I thought I tried that the other day and it complained that raid 5 > and 6 ( sic ) need at least 3 drives. Seemed like it was just a bug or > oversight. raid5 needs at least 3 disks to make sense (raid5 with 2 disks is the same as raid1), while raid6 needs at least 4 disks. But mdadm raid10 needs only two disks.