linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es (Peter T. Breuer)
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: > 2TB ?
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:10:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <l6vsd2-blf.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 09d601c50fb1$b9c9df10$020a0a0a@musicroom

No email <null@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Forgive me as this is probably a silly question and one that has been
> answered many times, I have tried to search for the answers but have
> ended up more confused than when I started.  So thought maybe I could
> ask the community to put me out of my misery
> 
> Is there a version of MD that can create larger than 2TB raid sets?  

Hmm ...  with 1KB blocks, and at 32 bits, 2^32 * 1KB = 4TB would be the
notional limit of any block device counted in blocks and using a 32bit
counter.

But in the 2.6 kernel the counter is 64bit.

> Obviously with 400GB drives being commonplace a typical 12 bay solution
> is capable of significant capacity,

3.6TB under raid0 or linear?

> but if we need to split this down
> into multiple raid sets, then we start to lose.  

I don't see that you have to on general principle even on a 2.4 kernel,
but maybe there are extra limits in the case of md devices over block
devices that I do not know about.

> So, if anyone can advise me as to MD / Linux size limitations I would be
> grateful :)

Well, I don't have anything to add to the observation above and I'm too
lazy to look! But where do you get the "2TB" number from? I can believe
that as a number for 1KB block devices in general in early 2.4 kernel
times, before signage had been dealt with.

Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-10 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-10 20:47 > 2TB ? No email
2005-02-10 21:10 ` Peter T. Breuer [this message]
2005-02-11  9:32   ` Molle Bestefich
2005-02-11 13:41     ` Carlos Knowlton
2005-02-11 22:10       ` XFS or JFS? (Was: > 2TB ?) Molle Bestefich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=l6vsd2-blf.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es \
    --to=ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).