From: Nat Makarevitch <nat@makarevitch.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the '--setra 65536' mistery, analysis and WTF?
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:12:13 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20080321T150605-207@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 18402.7274.174605.611654@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk
Peter Grandi <pg_lxra <at> lxra.for.sabi.co.UK> writes:
> this seems to indicate that not only the Linux block IO subsystems issues
> IO operations in multiples of the read-ahead size, but does so at a fixed
> number of times per second that is a multiple of 10.
Is it the case with a classic controller (not a 3ware?)
http://forums.storagereview.net/index.php?showtopic=25923 may be of
interest.
> Which lead me to think about elevators, which was also mentioned
> in some recent (and otherwise less interesting :->)
Sorry, I don't understand this.
> It still seems the case to me that the block IO subsystem
> structures IO in lots of read-ahead sectors
Isn't it specific to the 3ware driver and/or hardware, even in
SINGLE (JBOD) mode?
> Finally, I am getting a bit skeptical about elevators in general;
> several tests show no-elevator as not being significantly worse
> and sometimes better than any elevator
Isn't it specific to intelligent controllers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-05 17:21 the '--setra 65536' mistery, analysis and WTF? pg_mh, Peter Grandi
2008-03-13 13:02 ` Nat Makarevitch
2008-03-18 21:31 ` Peter Grandi
2008-03-20 8:12 ` Peter Grandi
2008-03-21 15:12 ` Nat Makarevitch [this message]
2008-03-25 12:05 ` Why are MD block IO requests subject to 'plugging'? Peter Grandi
2008-03-25 19:39 ` Peter Grandi
2008-03-27 4:07 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20080321T150605-207@post.gmane.org \
--to=nat@makarevitch.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).