From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joel <jdy@cryregarder.com>
Subject: Re: Some md/mdadm bugs
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20120206T194940-811@post.gmane.org>
References: <4F2ADF45.4040103@shiftmail.org> <20120203081717.195bfec8@notabene.brown> <4F2B1519.5010500@shiftmail.org> <loom.20120206T175724-186@post.gmane.org> <4F302045.2090300@shiftmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Asdo <asdo <at> shiftmail.org> writes:


> No, it is really --incremental --fail :
> it behaves like --incremental --fail, while --incremental --force is an 
> illegal combination for mdadm (I just tried)

Shoot!  You are absolutely right.  My manpage reading skills must need serious
refreshment!