From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Michal Januszewski <spock@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] userns: Replace netlink uses of cap_raised with capable.
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:55:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1mx6sz2f2.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In 2009 Philip Reiser notied that a few users of netlink connector
interface needed a capability check and added the idiom
cap_raised(nsp->eff_cap, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to a few of them, on the premise
that netlink was asynchronous.
In 2011 Patrick McHardy noticed we were being silly because netlink is
synchronous and removed eff_cap from the netlink_skb_params and changed
the idiom to cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
Looking at those spots with a fresh eye we should be calling
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN). The only reason I can see for not calling
capable is that it once appeared we were not in the same task as the
caller which would have made calling capable() impossible.
In the initial user_namespace the only difference between between
cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) and capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
are a few sanity checks and the fact that capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
sets PF_SUPERPRIV if we use the capability.
Since we are going to be using root privilege setting PF_SUPERPRIV
seems the right thing to do.
The motivation for this that patch is that in a child user namespace
cap_raised(current_cap(),...) tests your capabilities with respect to
that child user namespace not capabilities in the initial user namespace
and thus will allow processes that should be unprivielged to use the
kernel services that are only protected with
cap_raised(current_cap(),..).
To fix possible user_namespace issues and to just clean up the code
replace cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) with
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c | 2 +-
drivers/video/uvesafb.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
index abfaaca..946166e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
@@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static void drbd_connector_callback(struct cn_msg *req, struct netlink_skb_parms
return;
}
- if (!cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
retcode = ERR_PERM;
goto fail;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c b/drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c
index 1f23e04..08d9a20 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void cn_ulog_callback(struct cn_msg *msg, struct netlink_skb_parms *nsp)
{
struct dm_ulog_request *tfr = (struct dm_ulog_request *)(msg + 1);
- if (!cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return;
spin_lock(&receiving_list_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/video/uvesafb.c b/drivers/video/uvesafb.c
index 260cca7..9f7d27a 100644
--- a/drivers/video/uvesafb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/uvesafb.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void uvesafb_cn_callback(struct cn_msg *msg, struct netlink_skb_parms *ns
struct uvesafb_task *utask;
struct uvesafb_ktask *task;
- if (!cap_raised(current_cap(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return;
if (msg->seq >= UVESAFB_TASKS_MAX)
--
1.7.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-04 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 1:55 Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-04-04 2:26 ` [PATCH] userns: Replace netlink uses of cap_raised with capable Serge E. Hallyn
2012-04-04 2:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-04-04 4:24 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2012-04-04 4:06 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1mx6sz2f2.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=spock@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).