linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* mdadm and size differences
@ 2015-11-24 10:32 Marco De Vitis
  2015-12-21  2:32 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marco De Vitis @ 2015-11-24 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Hi,
I cannot understand a difference in size I can see on an old Debian 5.0 
machine, maybe I'm just missing something obvious.

/dev/sdd is partitioned as follows, and /dev/sdf is exactly the same:

> #>fdisk -l /dev/sdd
>
> Disk /dev/sdd: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x000901d8
>
>    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sdd1               1          24      192748+  83  Linux
> /dev/sdd2              25       60801   488191252+   5  Extended
> /dev/sdd5              25         632     4883728+  83  Linux
> /dev/sdd6             633        2982    18876343+  83  Linux
> /dev/sdd7            2983        4199     9775521   83  Linux
> /dev/sdd8            4200        4807     4883728+  83  Linux
> /dev/sdd9            4808        5173     2939863+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
> /dev/sdd10           5174       31281   209712478+  83  Linux

You can see that sdd6 is twice the size of sdd7.
cfdisk reports sizes of around 20 GB and 10 GB:
     sdd6 -> 19329.41
     sdd7 -> 10010.17

All partitions in these two identical drives are configured as RAID 1 
using mdadm, but the md devices associated to sdd6/sdf6 and sdd7/sdf7 
are both reported to be 10 GB in size, as can be seen from the mdadm 
output below.

Why?

Thanks for any info.

> #>mdadm -vv --detail /dev/md2
> /dev/md2:
>         Version : 00.90
>   Creation Time : Thu Feb 22 16:18:11 2007
>      Raid Level : raid1
>      Array Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 2
>   Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 2
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>     Update Time : Mon Nov 23 14:19:23 2015
>           State : clean
>  Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
>  Failed Devices : 0
>   Spare Devices : 0
>
>            UUID : 5582dad7:7ac89883:0c2b9e1d:5009dd35
>          Events : 0.69228
>
>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>        0       8       54        0      active sync   /dev/sdd6
>        1       8       86        1      active sync   /dev/sdf6
>
> #>mdadm -vv --detail /dev/md3
> /dev/md3:
>         Version : 00.90
>   Creation Time : Thu Feb 22 16:18:54 2007
>      Raid Level : raid1
>      Array Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 2
>   Total Devices : 2
> Preferred Minor : 3
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>     Update Time : Mon Nov 23 14:19:27 2015
>           State : clean
>  Active Devices : 2
> Working Devices : 2
>  Failed Devices : 0
>   Spare Devices : 0
>
>            UUID : e44836cf:6340f7fa:52fb3562:a78d4dbb
>          Events : 0.187630
>
>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>        0       8       55        0      active sync   /dev/sdd7
>        1       8       87        1      active sync   /dev/sdf7

-- 
Ciao,
   Marco.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: mdadm and size differences
  2015-11-24 10:32 mdadm and size differences Marco De Vitis
@ 2015-12-21  2:32 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2015-12-21  2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco De Vitis, linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3131 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 24 2015, Marco De Vitis wrote:

> Hi,
> I cannot understand a difference in size I can see on an old Debian 5.0 
> machine, maybe I'm just missing something obvious.
...
>
> You can see that sdd6 is twice the size of sdd7.
> cfdisk reports sizes of around 20 GB and 10 GB:
>      sdd6 -> 19329.41
>      sdd7 -> 10010.17
>
> All partitions in these two identical drives are configured as RAID 1 
> using mdadm, but the md devices associated to sdd6/sdf6 and sdd7/sdf7 
> are both reported to be 10 GB in size, as can be seen from the mdadm 
> output below.
>
> Why?

Probably because the arrays aren't using the whole partition.
e.g. if you have a RAID! comprised of 2 1GB partitions,
then you fail one partition and had a 2GB partition as a spare and let
it rebuild.  Then fail the other 1GB partition and add a 3GB partition
as a spare and let it rebuild.
Then you will have a 1GB RAID made from 2 partitions, a 2GB partition
and a 3GB partition.

If you want to resize the RAID! to use all the available space, then use
the command
  mdadm --grow /dev/md2 --size=max

You might then need to resize and filesystem you have in that array.

NeilBrown


>
> Thanks for any info.
>
>> #>mdadm -vv --detail /dev/md2
>> /dev/md2:
>>         Version : 00.90
>>   Creation Time : Thu Feb 22 16:18:11 2007
>>      Raid Level : raid1
>>      Array Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>>   Used Dev Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>>    Raid Devices : 2
>>   Total Devices : 2
>> Preferred Minor : 2
>>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>>     Update Time : Mon Nov 23 14:19:23 2015
>>           State : clean
>>  Active Devices : 2
>> Working Devices : 2
>>  Failed Devices : 0
>>   Spare Devices : 0
>>
>>            UUID : 5582dad7:7ac89883:0c2b9e1d:5009dd35
>>          Events : 0.69228
>>
>>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>>        0       8       54        0      active sync   /dev/sdd6
>>        1       8       86        1      active sync   /dev/sdf6
>>
>> #>mdadm -vv --detail /dev/md3
>> /dev/md3:
>>         Version : 00.90
>>   Creation Time : Thu Feb 22 16:18:54 2007
>>      Raid Level : raid1
>>      Array Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>>   Used Dev Size : 9767424 (9.31 GiB 10.00 GB)
>>    Raid Devices : 2
>>   Total Devices : 2
>> Preferred Minor : 3
>>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>>     Update Time : Mon Nov 23 14:19:27 2015
>>           State : clean
>>  Active Devices : 2
>> Working Devices : 2
>>  Failed Devices : 0
>>   Spare Devices : 0
>>
>>            UUID : e44836cf:6340f7fa:52fb3562:a78d4dbb
>>          Events : 0.187630
>>
>>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>>        0       8       55        0      active sync   /dev/sdd7
>>        1       8       87        1      active sync   /dev/sdf7
>
> -- 
> Ciao,
>    Marco.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-21  2:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-24 10:32 mdadm and size differences Marco De Vitis
2015-12-21  2:32 ` NeilBrown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).