linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>
To: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Cc: jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	learner.study@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:07:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <o2h7efa8a7d1004050307wec888a73tc297827a0ea6cf8d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j2z5bdc1c8b1004041538mafc2efb5lc03d8d82e29e7b31@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Mark, all:

My apologies if I sounded like a pest by asking too many
questions...Since I don't have access to array of disks, I sought to
the list to see if I could use the info already out there instead of
reinventing it...how well suited is linux raid for 10G kind of
traffic..I don't have resources to check it myself and thought of
asking for help/guidance!

Thanks!

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Jools Wills <jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 11:46 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>> Are you just trolling or something? Why are you asking about non-linux
>>> RAID on a Linux software RAID list?
>>
>> Don't want to start any flame war, but I had no problem with the mail,
>> and it seemed a relevant question. After all, we need to compare against
>> other systems to remain on top right? to strive to be the best?
>>
>> If platform A and B is doing XYZ in terms of raid, then it is surely up
>> for discussion. I think such attitudes like this make people think we
>> are fanatical, rather than educated developers trying to improve things.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Jools
>>
>> Jools Wills
>> --
>> IT Consultant
>> Oxford Inspire - http://www.oxfordinspire.co.uk - be inspired
>> t: 01235 519446 m: 07966 577498
>> jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk
>>
>>
>
> You are right. There wasn't anything wrong with the questionas asked
> and it was not my intent to start any wars. My apologies if it sounded
> that way.
>
> My reading of this thread in total has been pretty much that the OP
> doesn't know much about RAID (fair enough), or PC architecture (fair
> enough) and wants to ask little questions over and over to get
> information without doing much work on his own. (possibly not so
> fair.) I should just shut my mouth and let the messages go by which I
> will do with this individual from here on out.
>
> My apologies,
> Mark
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-05 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31 19:42 Linux Raid performance Learner Study
2010-03-31 20:15 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02  3:07   ` Learner Study
2010-04-02  9:58     ` Nicolae Mihalache
2010-04-02 17:58       ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 11:05     ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 11:18       ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 17:55       ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 21:14         ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 21:37           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 11:20             ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 15:56               ` Learner Study
2010-04-04  1:58                 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03  0:10           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  0:39         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:00           ` John Robinson
2010-04-03  1:14           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  1:32             ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:37               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  3:06                 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  3:00             ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 19:27               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 18:14             ` MRK
2010-04-03 19:56               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-04 15:00                 ` MRK
2010-04-04 18:26                   ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 18:46                     ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-04 21:28                       ` Jools Wills
2010-04-04 22:38                         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-05 10:07                           ` Learner Study [this message]
2010-04-05 16:35                             ` John Robinson
2010-04-04 22:24                       ` Guy Watkins
2010-04-05 13:49                         ` Drew
2010-04-04 23:24                   ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 11:20                     ` MRK
2010-04-05 19:49                       ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 21:03                         ` Drew
2010-04-05 22:20                           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 23:49                           ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-14 20:50             ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=o2h7efa8a7d1004050307wec888a73tc297827a0ea6cf8d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=learner.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=jools@oxfordinspire.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markknecht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).