* q: RAID1 with very unbalanced disk performance
@ 2010-04-06 15:28 Olaf Zevenboom
2010-04-06 16:31 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Zevenboom @ 2010-04-06 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Dear List,
We have a setup with two SATA2 1.5 TB harddisks in MD/LVM2 RAID1 setup
on Debian Lenny stock kernel.
As it is suffering from performance troubles I did take a closer look
and noticed that /dev/sda is way more intensively used than /dev/sdb. I
monitored the drives with various tools including atop.
/dev/sda is always a bit busier than /dev/sdb. This behavior can also be
seen on other systems with a similar setup (Etch and Lenny), but on this
particular system /dev/sda is about 10% more intensively used. Although
I think that is quite a lot and not as it should be I can live with
that. What worries me more is that /dev/sda can peek upto 100%
disk-utilization causing the system to be temporary unresponsive whilest
/dev/sdb does not seem to peek over 20% or so.
Any pointers on what is happening here and/or how I can resolve this
issue are quite welcome.
Thanking you in advance,
Olaf Zevenboom
Details:
Running Debian Lenny with stock kernel 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP
LVM2 on top of MD
2 SATA2 1.5tb disks: lsscsi
[0:0:0:0] disk ATA WDC WD15EARS-00Z 80.0 /dev/sda
[1:0:0:0] disk ATA ST31500541AS CC32 /dev/sdb
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
1464886912 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
248896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 2890 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1445.36 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 300 MB in 3.01 seconds = 99.67 MB/sec
hdparm -tT /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing cached reads: 7482 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3743.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 302 MB in 3.02 seconds = 100.00 MB/sec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: q: RAID1 with very unbalanced disk performance
2010-04-06 15:28 q: RAID1 with very unbalanced disk performance Olaf Zevenboom
@ 2010-04-06 16:31 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2010-04-06 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: olaf; +Cc: linux-raid
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Olaf Zevenboom <olaf@artefact.nl> wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> We have a setup with two SATA2 1.5 TB harddisks in MD/LVM2 RAID1 setup on
> Debian Lenny stock kernel.
> As it is suffering from performance troubles I did take a closer look and
> noticed that /dev/sda is way more intensively used than /dev/sdb. I
> monitored the drives with various tools including atop.
> /dev/sda is always a bit busier than /dev/sdb. This behavior can also be
> seen on other systems with a similar setup (Etch and Lenny), but on this
> particular system /dev/sda is about 10% more intensively used. Although I
> think that is quite a lot and not as it should be I can live with that. What
> worries me more is that /dev/sda can peek upto 100% disk-utilization causing
> the system to be temporary unresponsive whilest /dev/sdb does not seem to
> peek over 20% or so.
> Any pointers on what is happening here and/or how I can resolve this issue
> are quite welcome.
>
> Thanking you in advance,
> Olaf Zevenboom
>
> Details:
>
> Running Debian Lenny with stock kernel 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP
> LVM2 on top of MD
>
> 2 SATA2 1.5tb disks: lsscsi
> [0:0:0:0] disk ATA WDC WD15EARS-00Z 80.0 /dev/sda
> [1:0:0:0] disk ATA ST31500541AS CC32 /dev/sdb
>
> cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1]
> md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
> 1464886912 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
> 248896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> unused devices: <none>
>
> hdparm -tT /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing cached reads: 2890 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1445.36 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 300 MB in 3.01 seconds = 99.67 MB/sec
>
> hdparm -tT /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing cached reads: 7482 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3743.83 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 302 MB in 3.02 seconds = 100.00 MB/sec
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
I suspect it's not 'sda' as much as it is the WD15EARS itself that's making sda.
I purchased 6 WD10EARS drives and they simply didn't work for RAID,
but even in single drive situations I see stuff going on with them I
don't understand. One clue is that smartctl tells me the
LOAD_CYCLE_COUNT is increasing at a rate of 30/hour and I haven't
found out why. At that rate the drive is out of spec in 18 months, not
3 years, and I've seen this on two different machines. I saw problems
in dmesg and /var/log/messages about reads and writes being blocked
and once in awhile a kernel warning with trace back about a drive
timing out.
On the other hand I replaced the 1TB WD10EARS with a Raid Edition
500GB WD drive - WD5002ABYS - and I see none of these problems. My
RAID1 setup is working great. I have no error or warning messages
anywhere that I can find. Granted, half the storage for $10 more per
drive, but it WORKS!
Just my observations so far.
- Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-06 16:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-06 15:28 q: RAID1 with very unbalanced disk performance Olaf Zevenboom
2010-04-06 16:31 ` Mark Knecht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).