From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2EEC433E6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D2220872 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726857AbgH1Qib (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:38:31 -0400 Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:57330 "EHLO ciao.gmane.io" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbgH1Qi3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:38:29 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBhOU-00018a-3y for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:38:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org From: Ian Pilcher Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Detail: don't display the raid level when it's inactive Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:38:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20200826151658.3493-1-lidong.zhong@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20200826151658.3493-1-lidong.zhong@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org On 8/26/20 10:16 AM, Lidong Zhong wrote: > ... > So the misleading "raid0" is shown in this testcase. I think maybe > the "Raid Level" item shouldn't be displayed any more for the inactive > array. As a system administrator, I'd much rather see "unknown" (or something similar), rather than simply omitting the information. -- ======================================================================== In Soviet Russia, Google searches you! ========================================================================