From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913FC43334 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 13:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232900AbiFYN7D (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:59:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60922 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232157AbiFYN7C (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:59:02 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1387 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 06:59:01 PDT Received: from pott.psjt.org (pott.psjt.org [46.38.234.111]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7FB1403D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 06:59:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=psjt.org; s=psjt01; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References: Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=R0jvq6OXnw4c5ETfg89+ECkWtGR09+Ibkr+mc+YUy+c=; b=41E0eH0vkJeDrYfv9XXAJrOeNq 0Tn3ttedBVrBvSQE2NAKTyipS9BeWu4tLgnPIWVhb5jMqwgNS+7wOFgZ1BIxZtSa5D6ZuP76aM3SV qc2t0oP6xZQBU53IxSqvJgRn8sLhQrD4JukNJShsxII1DRyoQ/BzGHq6X1YRifBjOqdta2b+rp86j 5v3tgTvCZj1asjfzrs0G+M3WmG3bRgeEvw4J4/HkO9SvGqWL/R29/RrDTC65SbZ8M/FGBQdefOT3i en88sEuIneHWQTcTHxHcsdffyxjBkvay2PvKZaUgA4NyZQsxnW3r1EJJ5JI5EB9sb0Jah3NJvLffJ Rk0+SQgQ==; Received: from [10.1.1.3] (helo=malachite.psjt.org) by pott.psjt.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o55x1-0008Jm-ME for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:35:52 +0200 Received: from blaulicht.dmz.brux ([10.1.1.10]) by malachite.psjt.org with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1o55x1-0005pS-V0; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:35:51 +0200 Received: from stephan by blaulicht.dmz.brux with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1o55x1-0008NR-UF; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:35:51 +0200 From: Stephan To: Linux-RAID Subject: Re: Upgrading motherboard + CPU References: <81c50899-7edb-e629-3bbc-16cfa8f17e34@youngman.org.uk> <5cbd9dd1-73fc-ce11-4a9d-8752f7bea979@youngman.org.uk> <1de4bf1f-242b-7d02-23dc-a6d05893db81@plouf.fr.eu.org> <20220624232049.502a541e@nvm> <20220624234453.43cf4c74@nvm> <22102e4b-4738-672d-0d00-bbeccb54fe84@shenkin.org> <5cb8d159-be2a-aa6c-888a-fcb9ed4555c1@youngman.org.uk> <20220625030833.3398d8a4@nvm> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:35:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Pascal Hambourg's message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:54:08 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Pascal Hambourg writes: > Why 0.90 ? It is obsolete. If you need RAID metadata at the end of > RAID members for whatever ugly reason, you can use metadata 1.0 > instead. Does mdraid with metadata 1 work on the root filesystem w/o initramfs? -- Stephan