From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Li Youhong" <dayou5941@163.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 02:51:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-204355@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109023055.2164333-1-dayou5941@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] md: stop_sync_thread() in md_stop() races with running
md_start_sync()
- [Medium] md: md_check_recovery() can re-queue sync_work during
md_stop()
--
commit 1d5026b108bd24d6a0ff2d1fe48dedbb1f84d4d9
Author: Li Youhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers
This commit sets MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN and calls stop_sync_thread() in
md_stop() so that pending sync_work finishes before __md_stop() clears
mddev->pers.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 03e35386a8028..6f0fb2bb1fc2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7130,6 +7130,14 @@ void md_stop(struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
>
> + /*
> + * md_check_recovery() may have queued sync_work; that work accesses
> + * pers. Wait for it here before __md_stop() clears pers, as
> + * do_md_stop()/md_stop_writes() do.
> + */
> + set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
> + stop_sync_thread(mddev, true);
[Severity: Medium]
Can stop_sync_thread() return while md_start_sync() is still accessing
mddev after dropping reconfig_mutex?
Once a worker dequeues mddev->sync_work and starts md_start_sync(),
work_pending(&mddev->sync_work) is false, so stop_sync_thread() skips
flush_work(&mddev->sync_work). In the not_running path of
md_start_sync() (such as on a read-only dm-raid array), md_start_sync()
clears MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING and drops reconfig_mutex before resuming the
device and touching mddev:
CPU0 (raid_dtr) CPU1 (kworker: md_start_sync)
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, ...)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
mddev_lock_nointr(&rs->md)
md_stop(&rs->md)
stop_sync_thread(mddev, true)
!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING)
return
__md_stop(mddev)
mddev_unlock(&rs->md)
raid_set_free(rs)
kfree(rs)
__mddev_resume(mddev, false)
test_and_clear_bit(..., &mddev->recovery)
<-- use-after-free
Unconditionally calling flush_work(&mddev->sync_work) after
__md_stop_writes() or after mddev_detach() stops mddev->thread would
ensure md_start_sync() has completely finished before raid_dtr() frees
struct raid_set.
[Severity: Medium]
Can md_check_recovery() re-queue mddev->sync_work while
stop_sync_thread() drops reconfig_mutex in md_stop()?
stop_sync_thread() is called before __md_stop() -> mddev_detach() stops
mddev->thread. When MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is set on entry,
stop_sync_thread() unlocks reconfig_mutex (waking mddev->thread) and
waits for MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING to clear before re-locking reconfig_mutex.
On a read-only array (such as dm-raid during raid_dtr() after
raid_postsuspend()), the !md_is_rdwr(mddev) branch of
md_check_recovery() does not check MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN before queuing
sync_work:
drivers/md/md.c:md_check_recovery() {
...
if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev)) {
...
if (md_spares_need_change(mddev)) {
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->sync_work);
}
...
}
This allows mddev->thread to queue a new sync_work before
stop_sync_thread() re-acquires reconfig_mutex:
CPU0 (raid_dtr) CPU1 (mddev->thread)
md_stop(&rs->md)
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, ...)
stop_sync_thread(mddev, true)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
wait_event(resync_wait, ...)
/* previous sync finishes */
md_check_recovery()
mddev_trylock(mddev)
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, ...)
queue_work(..., &mddev->sync_work)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
mddev_lock_nointr(mddev)
__md_stop(mddev)
mddev->pers = NULL
raid_set_free(rs)
/* kworker runs md_start_sync() */
remove_spares()
mddev->pers->hot_remove_disk()
<-- NULL pointer dereference / UAF
Checking MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN in the !md_is_rdwr(mddev) path of
md_check_recovery() (matching the read-write path), or stopping
sync_work after mddev->thread has been stopped, would close this race.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109023055.2164333-1-dayou5941@163.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 2:30 [PATCH v2] md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers Li Youhong
2026-11-09 2:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-204355@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dayou5941@163.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox