linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: How robust is MD/multipath????
@ 2003-09-29 12:16 Doug Griswold
  2003-09-29 12:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Griswold @ 2003-09-29 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lmb, linux-raid

How about without the patch?  I'm using rh as2.1 so if I recompile I
will lose support if ever needed.  Is the red hat md/multipath
production ready???

>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> 09/29/03 05:27AM >>>
On 2003-09-27T18:34:39,
   Doug Griswold <griswld@cio.sc.gov> said:

> Just wondering if I use multipath for failover on our SAN
> if I should expect any problems, ie performance/stability.

We are quite happy with 2.4 md multipath + my patch set from
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/lmb/md-mp/. 2.6 I've not tested yet at
all.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering		ever tried. ever failed. no
matter.
SuSE Labs				try again. fail again. fail
better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG		-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How robust is MD/multipath????
@ 2003-09-29 12:21 Doug Griswold
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Griswold @ 2003-09-29 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lmb, linux-raid

Obviously you have never talked to Red Hat's tech support.  He. HE.
By the way I tried your patch and it worked rather well just don't know
if I want to give up terrible tech support for it yet or not.  Point
taken.

>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> 09/29/03 08:17AM >>>
On 2003-09-29T08:16:15,
   Doug Griswold <griswld@cio.sc.gov> said:

> How about without the patch?  I'm using rh as2.1 so if I recompile I
> will lose support if ever needed.  Is the red hat md/multipath
> production ready???

I suggest you direct that question to your RH support representative
if
you care about it being 'officially' production ready.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering		ever tried. ever failed. no
matter.
SuSE Labs				try again. fail again. fail
better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG		-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* How robust is MD/multipath????
@ 2003-09-27 22:34 Doug Griswold
  2003-09-29  9:27 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Griswold @ 2003-09-27 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid

Just wondering if I use multipath for failover on our SAN
if I should expect any problems, ie performance/stability.



Thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-29 12:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-29 12:16 How robust is MD/multipath???? Doug Griswold
2003-09-29 12:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-29 12:21 Doug Griswold
2003-09-27 22:34 Doug Griswold
2003-09-29  9:27 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).