From: "Dhaval Patel" <dhaval@patel.sh>
To: "Rechenberg, Andrew" <ARechenberg@shermanfinancialgroup.com>,
Bob Hillegas <bobhillegas@houston.rr.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Consensus?...
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:40:30 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <twig.1062103230.73352@metaverge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8075D5C3061B9441944E13737764511832275E@cinshrexc03.shermfin.com>
I am using ide array with the 3ware 7500 ide raid card. Its been stable. We did have
initial problems due to a faulty motherboard. But once we swapped that out things have
been smooth.
"Rechenberg, Andrew" <ARechenberg@shermanfinancialgroup.com> said:
> We've had excellent luck with the Adaptec 39160's for our Linux RAID
> system. We're running a 52-disk software RAID10 array with (4) 39160's
> and have had no issue (knock wood) in the 6 months that it has been in
> production.
>
> I cannot comment on non-SCSI controllers as I have not used any with
> Linux RAID.
>
> HTH,
> Andy.
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Hillegas [mailto:bobhillegas@houston.rr.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:53 PM
> > To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > I will be setting up a raided system early next year once
> > kernel 2.6 is stable.
> >
> > Is there any consensus as to which scsi adapter AND non-scsi
> > adapter will be preferred?
> >
> > Thanks, BobH
> > --
> > Bob Hillegas <bobhillegas@houston.rr.com>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-raid" in the body of a message to
> > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-28 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-28 15:41 Consensus? Rechenberg, Andrew
2003-08-28 20:40 ` Dhaval Patel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-28 1:53 Consensus? Bob Hillegas
2003-08-28 21:49 ` Consensus? Peter L. Ashford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=twig.1062103230.73352@metaverge.net \
--to=dhaval@patel.sh \
--cc=ARechenberg@shermanfinancialgroup.com \
--cc=bobhillegas@houston.rr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).