From: Su Yue <l@damenly.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, xni@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
ubizjak@gmail.com, cl@linux.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] md: fix is_mddev_idle()
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 09:42:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <v7r19baz.fsf@damenly.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418010941.667138-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> (Yu Kuai's message of "Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:09:40 +0800")
On Fri 18 Apr 2025 at 09:09, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> If sync_speed is above speed_min, then is_mddev_idle() will be
> called
> for each sync IO to check if the array is idle, and inflihgt
> sync_io
> will be limited if the array is not idle.
>
> However, while mkfs.ext4 for a large raid5 array while recovery
> is in
> progress, it's found that sync_speed is already above speed_min
> while
> lots of stripes are used for sync IO, causing long delay for
> mkfs.ext4.
>
> Root cause is the following checking from is_mddev_idle():
>
> t1: submit sync IO: events1 = completed IO - issued sync IO
> t2: submit next sync IO: events2 = completed IO - issued sync
> IO
> if (events2 - events1 > 64)
>
> For consequence, the more sync IO issued, the less likely
> checking will
> pass. And when completed normal IO is more than issued sync IO,
> the
> condition will finally pass and is_mddev_idle() will return
> false,
> however, last_events will be updated hence is_mddev_idle() can
> only
> return false once in a while.
>
> Fix this problem by changing the checking as following:
>
> 1) mddev doesn't have normal IO completed;
> 2) mddev doesn't have normal IO inflight;
> 3) if any member disks is partition, and all other partitions
> doesn't
> have IO completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 84
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/md/md.h | 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 52cadfce7e8d..dfd85a5d6112 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -8625,50 +8625,58 @@ void md_cluster_stop(struct mddev
> *mddev)
> put_cluster_ops(mddev);
> }
>
> -static int is_mddev_idle(struct mddev *mddev, int init)
> +static bool is_rdev_holder_idle(struct md_rdev *rdev, bool
> init)
> {
> + unsigned long last_events = rdev->last_events;
> +
> + if (!bdev_is_partition(rdev->bdev))
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * If rdev is partition, and user doesn't issue IO to the
> array, the
> + * array is still not idle if user issues IO to other
> partitions.
> + */
> + rdev->last_events =
> part_stat_read_accum(rdev->bdev->bd_disk->part0,
> + sectors) -
> + part_stat_read_accum(rdev->bdev, sectors);
> +
> + if (!init && rdev->last_events > last_events)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * mddev is idle if following conditions are match since last
> check:
> + * 1) mddev doesn't have normal IO completed;
> + * 2) mddev doesn't have inflight normal IO;
> + * 3) if any member disk is partition, and other partitions
> doesn't have IO
> + * completed;
> + *
> + * Noted this checking rely on IO accounting is enabled.
> + */
> +static bool is_mddev_idle(struct mddev *mddev, int init)
> +{
> + unsigned long last_events = mddev->last_events;
> + struct gendisk *disk;
> struct md_rdev *rdev;
> - int idle;
> - int curr_events;
> + bool idle = true;
>
> - idle = 1;
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - rdev_for_each_rcu(rdev, mddev) {
> - struct gendisk *disk = rdev->bdev->bd_disk;
> + disk = mddev_is_dm(mddev) ? mddev->dm_gendisk :
> mddev->gendisk;
> + if (!disk)
> + return true;
>
> - if (!init && !blk_queue_io_stat(disk->queue))
> - continue;
> + mddev->last_events = part_stat_read_accum(disk->part0,
> sectors);
> + if (!init && (mddev->last_events > last_events ||
> + bdev_count_inflight(disk->part0)))
> + idle = false;
>
Forgot return or goto here?
--
Su
> - curr_events = (int)part_stat_read_accum(disk->part0,
> sectors) -
> - atomic_read(&disk->sync_io);
> - /* sync IO will cause sync_io to increase before the
> disk_stats
> - * as sync_io is counted when a request starts, and
> - * disk_stats is counted when it completes.
> - * So resync activity will cause curr_events to be smaller
> than
> - * when there was no such activity.
> - * non-sync IO will cause disk_stat to increase without
> - * increasing sync_io so curr_events will (eventually)
> - * be larger than it was before. Once it becomes
> - * substantially larger, the test below will cause
> - * the array to appear non-idle, and resync will slow
> - * down.
> - * If there is a lot of outstanding resync activity when
> - * we set last_event to curr_events, then all that
> activity
> - * completing might cause the array to appear non-idle
> - * and resync will be slowed down even though there might
> - * not have been non-resync activity. This will only
> - * happen once though. 'last_events' will soon reflect
> - * the state where there is little or no outstanding
> - * resync requests, and further resync activity will
> - * always make curr_events less than last_events.
> - *
> - */
> - if (init || curr_events - rdev->last_events > 64) {
> - rdev->last_events = curr_events;
> - idle = 0;
> - }
> - }
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + rdev_for_each_rcu(rdev, mddev)
> + if (!is_rdev_holder_idle(rdev, init))
> + idle = false;
> rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> return idle;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index b57842188f18..1d51c2405d3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct md_rdev {
>
> sector_t sectors; /* Device size (in 512bytes sectors)
> */
> struct mddev *mddev; /* RAID array if running */
> - int last_events; /* IO event timestamp */
> + unsigned long last_events; /* IO event timestamp */
>
> /*
> * If meta_bdev is non-NULL, it means that a separate device
> is
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ struct mddev {
> * adding a spare
> */
>
> + unsigned long last_events; /* IO event timestamp
> */
> atomic_t recovery_active; /* blocks scheduled, but
> not written */
> wait_queue_head_t recovery_wait;
> sector_t recovery_cp;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-19 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 1:09 [PATCH v2 0/5] md: fix is_mddev_idle() Yu Kuai
2025-04-18 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] block: cleanup and export bdev IO inflight APIs Yu Kuai
2025-04-21 11:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-21 13:13 ` Yu Kuai
2025-04-22 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-18 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] md: record dm-raid gendisk in mddev Yu Kuai
2025-04-22 6:00 ` Xiao Ni
2025-04-18 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] md: add a new api sync_io_depth Yu Kuai
2025-04-22 6:15 ` Xiao Ni
2025-04-18 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] md: fix is_mddev_idle() Yu Kuai
2025-04-19 1:42 ` Su Yue [this message]
2025-04-19 2:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-04-19 5:03 ` Su Yue
2025-04-22 6:35 ` Xiao Ni
2025-04-27 1:37 ` Yu Kuai
2025-04-27 2:45 ` Xiao Ni
2025-04-18 1:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] md: cleanup accounting for issued sync IO Yu Kuai
2025-04-22 6:36 ` Xiao Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=v7r19baz.fsf@damenly.org \
--to=l@damenly.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox